Duration of physician-industry relationships and prescribing changes in oncology.

Authors

Aaron Mitchell

Aaron Philip Mitchell

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Aaron Philip Mitchell , Aaron Winn , Jennifer Leigh Lund , Stacie Dusetzina

Organizations

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, Medical College of Wisconsin Pharmacy School, Milwaukee, WI, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Background: Physicians who accept payments from a pharmaceutical company are more likely to prescribe that company’s cancer drug[s]. Whether long-term physician-industry relationships are more likely than intermittent relationships to result in practice changes is unknown. Methods: Open Payments data, containing industry-physician financial transactions, was linked to Medicare Part D prescription drug claims for 2013-2015. We identified physicians who treated each of 4 cancer types which had multiple orally-administered treatment options: renal cell (axitinib, everolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib), lung (erlotinib, afatinib), CML (dasatinib, nilotinib), and prostate (abiraterone, enzalutamide). We used modified Poisson regression to test if the number of years (either 1, 2, or 3) in which a physician received payments was associated with increased prescribing of the paying company’s cancer drug in 2015. We also tested whether physicians at NCI-designated cancer centers were more likely to receive industry payments. Results: The physician cohort sizes were: RCC, 674; lung, 966; CML, 367; prostate, 1,483. Controlling for physician characteristics including practice size, prescribing volume, and total dollar amount received, physicians who received payments in all 3 years (vs. 1 year) were more likely to use the paying company’s drug within RCC (RR:1.69, 95%CI 1.32-2.17) and lung cancer (RR: 1.42, 95%CI 1.15-1.77), but not CML (RR:1.13, 95%CI 0.94-1.35) or prostate cancer (RR: 0.93, 95%CI 0.85-1.01). Results were similar comparing physicians who received payments in 3 years vs. 2 years: RCC RR:1.53, 95%CI:1.21–1.94; lung RR:1.12, 95%CI:0.93–1.35; CML RR:1.13, 95%CI 0.94–1.35; prostate RR:0.93, 95%CI:0.85–1.01. Physicians at NCI institutions were less likely to have received any industry payments during the study period (RR:0.70, 95%CI:0.61-0.80). Conclusions: Longer-term industry relationships may be associated with greater changes in drug prescribing than time-limited ones. Conflict-of-interest policies and disclosures may be more informative if specifying duration of industry relationships. This study was limited by a short time range, and lack of payment records prior to 2013.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 6607)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6607

Abstract #

6607

Poster Bd #

432

Abstract Disclosures

Funded by Conquer Cancer