Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Manuela Schmidinger , Giuseppe Procopio , Robert E. Hawkins , Angel Rodriguez Sanchez , Sergio Vazquez , Narayanan Srihari , Haralabos Kalofonos , Aristotelis Bamias , Petri Bono , Chaitali Babanrao Pisal , Yulia Hirschberg , Luca Dezzani , Qasim Iftikhar Ahmad , Eric Jonasch
Background: PRINCIPAL (NCT01649778) was the largest prospective real-world effectiveness and safety study of pazopanib (PAZ) in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: Pts with advanced and/or metastatic clear cell RCC were enrolled within 30 days of initiating first-line PAZ. Follow-up data on progression, survival, and safety was collected approximately every 3 months until death, consent withdrawal, or loss to follow-up, for up to 30 months. Primary efficacy end points were median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall response rate (ORR). Safety measures included frequency of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs of special interest. Results: Among 657 pts who received ≥1 dose of PAZ, 76.3% completed the study (33.0% completed 30 months of follow-up and 43.2% died). Median enrollment age was 66 years, with 57.2% aged ≥65 years. 4.1%, 62.6%, and 33.3% of pts were grouped as favorable, intermediate, or poor risk by Heng criteria, respectively. Most pts (84%) initiated treatment at 800 mg, and the median treatment time with or without dose interruption was 6.9 and 7.6 months, respectively. mPFS and mOS are shown in the Table. Among the measurable disease population (n = 168), ORR was 30.3%, median duration of response was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.6-14.6), and time to response, evaluated every 3 months, was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.9-3.1). Most pts had an AE (74.0%) that led to dose adjustment/interruption in 49.3% and treatment discontinuation in 14.6%. The most frequent ( > 10%) drug-related AEs were hypertension (20.9%), diarrhea (11.3%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (11.0%). Conclusions: Real-world effectiveness and safety outcomes in the PRINCIPAL study were consistent with clinical trials and support the first-line use of PAZ across all risk groups of pts with advanced or metastatic RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01649778
mPFS, months (95% CI) | mOS, months (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|
All pts | 10.4 (9.3-12.0) | 29.9 (24.7-NR) |
Heng risk group | ||
· Favorable | 16.1 (11.6-26.0) | NR (28.6-NR) |
· Intermediate | 12.5 (10.3-15.4) | 32.9 (32.9-NR) |
· Poor | 6.7 (5.8-9.1) | 14.8 (12.2-19.5) |
NR, not reached.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Thomas Hilser
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Paul D. Nathan
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Sunil Badami
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Hye Sook Han