SWOG S0905: A randomized phase II study of cediranib versus placebo in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed in chemonaive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors

Anne Tsao

Anne S. Tsao

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Anne S. Tsao , Jieling Miao , Ignacio Ivan Wistuba , Nicholas J. Vogelzang , John Heymach , Frank V. Fossella , Charles Lu , Mario R. Velasco , Brandy Box-Noriega , James Gilbert Hueftle , Shirish M. Gadgeel , Mary Weber Redman , David R. Gandara , Karen Kelly

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Cancer Care Spclsts, Decatur, IL, Kaiser Permanente, Fresno, CA, Frontier Cancer Ctr and Blood Inst, Butte, MT, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Anti-angiogenic inhibitors combined with cisplatin-pemetrexed (CP) have shown efficacy in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet derived growth factor receptor inhibitor, showed preliminary efficacy in SWOG 0905 phase I. Methods: S0905 phase II randomized MPM patients to CP with cediranib/placebo followed by maintenance cediranib/placebo (CPC v CPP). Randomization was stratified by PS (0-1 vs 2) and histology [epithelioid (E) vs biphasic or sarcomatoid (B/S)].The primary endpoint was RECIST PFS. The trial was designed to detect a difference in PFS at the 1-sided 0.10 level, using a stratified log-rank test. Results: Ninety-two eligible patients were enrolled (2011-2016). Median age was 72, 85% men, 75% E and 25% B/S histology. The trial met its primary objective: PFS was significantly prolonged by CPC (HR 0.69, p = 0.096, median PFS 7.2 vs 5.6 months). CPC did not increase RECIST RR (26% vs 18%, p = 0.48), but did prolong the duration of response (median 6 vs 1.7 months). By modified RECIST, CPC increased RR (53% vs 20%, p = 0.01). CPC numerically improved OS (HR 0.84, p = 0.44; median OS 10 vs. 8.5 months). E patients had a markedly improved survival compared to B/S patients (median PFS 7.1 vs 3.4 months, HR 0.61, p = 0.047 and median OS 10.9 vs 6.4 months, HR 0.605, p = 0.045). B/S patients may derive less benefit from cediranib than E patients in terms of OS (HR 0.83 for E v HR 1.03 for B/S) despite a similar RECIST PFS (B/S HR 0.71 and E HR 0.72). Grade 3-4 toxicities were 64% versus 54% for CPC vs. CPP (p = 0.273). The most common toxicities (any grade) associated with CPC were diarrhea (46.7% vs. 17%) and hypertension (44% vs. 15%). Conclusions: The addition of cediranib to CP improves RECIST PFS in patients with MPM. E patients may benefit more with anti-angiogenic agents. Clinical trial information: NCT01064648

OutcomeCPC
(median in months)
CPP
(median in months)
HR [95% CI], p-value
ITT PFS (RECIST)7.25.60.69 [0.45-1.07], 0.096
ITT PFS (modified RECIST)6.95.60.84 [0.55 – 1.23], 0.42
ITT OS108.50.84 [0.54 – 1.32], 0.44
E PFS (RECIST)7.46.10.72 [0.44-1.17], 0.18
B/S PFS (RECIST)3.430.71 [0.29-1.7], 0.44

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Local-Regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Mesothelioma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01064648

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 8514)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.8514

Abstract #

8514

Poster Bd #

120

Abstract Disclosures