University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Emily Meichun Ko , Colleen Brensinger , Diego J Aviles , Ashley Ford Haggerty , Robert Lawrence Giuntoli II, Nawar A. Latif , Mark Aloysuis Morgan , Lilie L. Lin
Background: To determine the impact on overall survival (OS) of the sequence-order of adjuvant radiation (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) on different advanced endometrial cancer (EC) histologies. Methods: Stage 3 endometrioid (EAC), serous (SER), clear cell (CC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) patients who underwent primary surgical staging from 1999-2011 were identified in SEER-Medicare. Sequence, timing, and modality of RT and CT were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log rank tests, and multivariable cox modeling. Treatment groups with n < 10 were excluded in cox modeling. Results: Of 2375 cases identified (1537 EAC, 485 SER, 96 CC, 257 CS), 31.3% received no AT. The remainder received RT or CT alone, concurrent RT-CT, serial or sandwich modalities (table 1). OS differed by receipt of AT overall as well as within each histologic subtype (log rank p < 0.05, all). After adjusting for age, race, substage, region, and histology, all patients receiving AT except for concurrent RT-CT followed by CT, had improved OS over no treatment (all p < 0.05). However, differences by histology were seen. For EAC the sandwich arm had the greatest reduction in death (72%), whereas for SER and CC the concurrent RT-CT arms fared best. For CS receipt of any CT improved OS, whereas above RT alone did not. (Table1). Conclusions: OS for advanced EC significantly differs by histology and mode of adjuvant therapy. Future studies should evaluate whether sandwich therapy for EAC, concurrent RT-CT for SER and CC, and CT alone for CS may most effectively improve OS.
Type of AT | (%) | All histology | EAC | SER | CC | CS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
None | 31.3 | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
RT | 26.2 | 0.80 (0.71, 0.91) | 0.78 (0.67, 0.92) | 0.96 (0.67, 1.36) | 0.90 (0.45, 1.81) | 0.73 (0.49, 1.09) |
CT | 24.8 | 0.60 (0.52, 0.70) | 0.60 (0.48, 0.74) | 0.69 (0.53, 0.90) | 0.60 (0.26, 1.36) | 0.45 (0.30, 0.67) |
Concur RT-CT | 9.5 | 0.51 (0.41, 0.64) | 0.60 (0.45, 0.79) | 0.43 (0.26, 0.69) | 0.29 (0.10, 0.82) | 0.50 (0.29, 0.87) |
Serial CT- RT | 4.4 | 0.52 (0.38, 0.72) | 0.56 (0.37, 0.84) | 0.68 (0.38, 1.22) | ||
Serial RT-CT | 1.6 | 0.60 (0.39, 0.93) | 0.55 (0.32, 0.95) | |||
Sandwich | 1.3 | 0.53 (0.31, 0.90) | 0.28 (0.12, 0.69) | |||
Concur RT-CT, then CT | 0.6 | 0.69 (0.32, 1.46) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Florence Joly
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Zhen Zeng
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Robert L. Coleman
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jacob McGee