Optimization of PD-L1 algorithm for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with urothelial cancer (UC) treated with durvalumab monotherapy.

Authors

null

Magda Zajac

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Magda Zajac , Jiabu Ye , Pralay Mukhopadhyay , Xiaoping Jin , Yong Ben , Joyce Antal , Ashok Kumar Gupta , Marlon Rebelatto , J. Andrew Williams , Jill Walker

Organizations

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom, AstraZeneca, Washington, DC, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, DAIICHI SANKYO, Potomac, MD, AstraZeneca (currently at BioAtla, San Diego, CA, USA), Gaithersburg, MD, MedImmune (currently at G1 Therapeutics Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA), Gaithersburg, MD, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: PD-L1 expression is a useful biomarker in predicting response to PD-1 and PD-L1 directed immunotherapies in a variety of tumor types. In UC, studies have implicated PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) as having clinical utility, but the relative importance of each cellular compartment and the most predictive algorithm and PD-L1 expression cutoff remain unclear. Methods: PD-L1 expression data (SP263 assay) from 188 patients in the UC cohort from single arm (durvalumab monotherapy) Phase 1/2 Study CD-ON-MEDI4736-1108 (NCT01693562; Oct. 2017 data cutoff) were assessed. Regression models were used to evaluate the impact of PD-L1 expression in TC or IC on OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), best percentage tumor change and tumor shrinkage 15 months after last subject randomization. Kaplan–Meier plots were generated to explore the impact of single biomarker and combined (TC or IC [% PD-L1 positive ICs within IC area]) algorithms on OS. Results: Both IC and TC PD-L1 were linked to higher ORR, and IC PD-L1 was associated with better survival in patients treated with durvalumab. IC PD-L1 had a higher impact on response to durvalumab than TC PD-L1, showing significant (P< 0.05) association with OS, PFS, ORR, and tumor shrinkage. The best outcomes were obtained when TC and IC algorithms were combined, with TC25%/IC25% proving optimal (Table). Conclusions: In UC, the TC25%/IC25% algorithm appears to provide optimal predictive value based on efficacy and prevalence of the biomarker. Additional data from randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical trial information: NCT01693562

Cutoff/algorithmORR, %
Median OS, months
Prevalence of
PD-L1 high pts, %
PD-L1 highPD-L1 lowPD-L1 highPD-L1 low
TC1%21.611.18.410.961.7
TC10%19.516.26.910.941.0
TC25%23.415.69.310.525.0
TC50%19.417.19.310.519.1
IC1%22.45.611.66.471.3
IC10%22.86.611.66.667.6
IC25%28.410.522.35.539.4
IC50%31.113.322.36.623.9
TC1%/IC1%20.90.010.86.484.0
TC10%/IC25%23.37.412.57.863.8
TC25%/IC25%27.55.819.84.854.3
TC50%/IC25%27.17.620.04.851.1

N = 188

IC: % PD-L1 positive ICs within IC area

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Nonprostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01693562

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 4530)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.4530

Abstract #

4530

Poster Bd #

356

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Nicky Wong Zhun Hong

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Noninvasive assessment of programmed-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in esophagogastric (EG) cancer using 18F-BMS-986229 PET.

First Author: Samuel Louis Cytryn

Abstract

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

PD-L1 expression and progression risk of stage III NSCLC patients on durvalumab consolidation.

First Author: Khalid Jazieh

First Author: Hidekazu Hirano