Phase 3 zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) vs bendamustine + rituximab (BR) in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL).

Authors

null

Peter Hillmen

St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom

Peter Hillmen , Jennifer R. Brown , Brad S. Kahl , Paolo Ghia , Tadeusz Robak , Carol Marimpietri , Aileen Cohen , Jane Huang , Constantine Si Lun Tam

Organizations

St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Cambridge, MA, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland, BeiGene, San Mateo, CA, BEIGENE USA, INC., San Mateo, CA, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; St Vincent's Hospital; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Inhibition of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) has emerged as a strategy for targeting B-cell malignancies including CLL/SLL. Zanubrutinib has been shown to be a novel 2nd-generation, potent, and specific BTK inhibitor in clinical studies to date. Early clinical data suggest that zanubrutinib treatment in pts with TN (n = 16) or relapsed/refractory (R/R; n = 50) CLL/SLL induced deep and sustained responses, with a 94% overall response rate (ORR) including 6% and 2% complete response rates in TN and R/R CLL/SLL, respectively (ICML 2017). We hypothesize that zanubrutinib monotherapy may have superior efficacy and potentially improved safety vs standard BR chemoimmunotherapy in pts with TN CLL/SLL. Methods: This ongoing Phase 3, randomized, open-label, global study (NCT03336333, BGB-3111-304) compares the efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib vs BR in adult pts with TN CLL/SLL considered unsuitable for treatment with FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab). In Cohort 1, pts lacking del(17p) (n ≈ 420) are randomized 1:1 to oral zanubrutinib 160 mg twice-daily or BR x 6 cycles. Randomization is stratified by age ( < 65 vs ≥ 65 y), Binet stage (C vs A/B), geographic region (North America vs Europe vs Asia-Pacific) and IGHV mutational status (mutated vs unmutated). In Cohort 2, pts with del(17p) (n ≈ 47) are enrolled and all receive zanubrutinib as in Cohort 1. Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed CD20+ CLL/SLL requiring treatment per iwCLL criteria, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate hematologic function. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) of zanubrutinib as compared to BR in Cohort 1 by independent review committee (IRC) according to iwCLL guidelines with modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis. The analysis of PFS between the 2 arms in Cohort 1 will be based on a log-rank test stratified by the randomization stratification factors. Key secondary end points include ORR, duration of response, overall survival, and safety in Cohorts 1 & 2. In Cohort 1, next-line treatment with zanubrutinib after IRC-confirmed progression on BR is included in the study design. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03336333

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sub Track

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Hairy Cell

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03336333

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr TPS7581)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.TPS7581

Abstract #

TPS7581

Poster Bd #

218a

Abstract Disclosures