The MD Anderson modified cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (mCBAD) for the treatment of newly diagnosed (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Authors

null

Samer Tabchi

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Samer Tabchi , Ranjit Nair , Krina K. Patel , Hans Chulhee Lee , Sheeba K. Thomas , Behrang Amini , Sairah Ahmed , Rohtesh S. Mehta , Qaiser Bashir , Muzaffar H. Qazilbash , Donna M. Weber , Robert Z. Orlowski , Raymond Alexanian , Lei Feng , Elisabet Esteve Manasanch

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

NIH

Background: MM follows a clinical course leading to refractoriness and limited treatment options in RRMM. Aggressive NDMM needs rapid cytoreduction for disease control, which may not be possible with standard novel therapies. We report on a highly effective therapy that offers a salvage option for these patients. Methods: We searched our medical database for MM patients who received mCBAD from 2010-2016 – 28 day cycle of cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2 IV twice daily + mesna 400mg/m2 IV daily (days 1-4), bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 SQ (days 1, 4, 8, 11), doxorubicin 9 mg/m2 IV (days 1-4) , dexamethasone 40 mg PO daily (days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20). IMWG criteria were used for response assessment. Descriptive statistics, Fisher’s exact test, Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Kaplan-Meier were used for statistical purposes. Results: 80 patients met the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics, response, adverse events, PFS/OS are summarized in Table 1. Median follow-up for the censored observations was 21.3 months (1.35 – 69.22). Conclusions: mCBAD offers excellent response rates (ORR > 90%) and favorable PFS/OS in highly refractory high risk MM. It is also an excellent salvage regimen with about half of patients undergoing subsequent transplant. Patient selection is required due high treatment related mortality.

NDMM (n = 15)RRMM (n = 65)
Age, median (range)56 (36 -74)65 (22 -75)
ISS, n(%)
I1 (7.1)15 (24.6)
II1 (7.1)15 (24.6)
III12 (85.7)31 (50.8)
FISH, n(%)
t(4:14)2 (14.3)6 (9.5)
t(14;16)02 (3.2)
deletion 17p2 (14.3)21 (33.3)
# cycles received, (%)
≤280%80%
≥320%20%
# prior therapies, median (range)02 (1 - 7)
Prior ASCT, n (%)024 (36.9)
ORR^, n (%)15 (100)54 (91.5)
CR3 (20)4 (6.8)
VGPR4 (26.7)13 (22)
PR8 (53.3)37 (62.7)
PD05 (8.5)
Adverse events*, n(%)
Neuropathy3 (20)20 (31)
Febrile neutropenia2 (13.3)18 (27.7)
Infection5 (33.3)26 (40.6)
Mortality08 (16%)
PFS, mo (95% CI)19.6 (10.3 - NR)6 (3.9- 7.2)
PFS (followed by ASCT)N/A8.95 (6.9-15.9) (n = 28)
PFS (not followed by ASCT)N/A3.2 (2.2 - 4.2) (n = 34)
OS mo (95% CI)35.4 (18.1 - NR)15.8 (9.3 - 23)

*related to treatment, ^ best response - 59 evaluable RRMM, ASCT = autologous transplant

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 8044)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.8044

Abstract #

8044

Poster Bd #

53

Abstract Disclosures