Efficacy and safety of lurbinectedin (PM1183) in Ewing sarcoma: Final results from a phase 2 study.

Authors

Vivek Subbiah

Vivek Subbiah

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Vivek Subbiah , Kamalesh Kumar Sankhala , Ravin Ratan , Enrique Sanz Garcia , Valentina Boni , Thierry Gil , Victor Manuel Villalobos , Sant P Chawla , Pilar Lardelli , Mariano Siguero , Carmen Maria Kahatt , Arturo Soto-Matos , Stefano Ferrari

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Hospital Vall D’Hebron, Barcelona, ES, START Madrid CIOCC Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, PharmaMar, Madrid, Spain, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Patients (pts) with relapsed Ewing sarcoma (ES) have a poor outcome. New therapeutic agents are needed. L is a new anticancer drug that blocks transcription and induces DNA double-strand breaks, leading to apoptosis. Moreover, in sarcomas associated with translocations, such as ES, in which the translocation produces a fusion protein that acts as a deregulated transcription factor, L might interfere with the binding of this protein to specific DNA promoters and thus with the synthesis of downstream proteins. Methods: A multicenter phase 2 trial to assess efficacy and safety of L in several types of advanced solid tumors (basket trial), including ES, is ongoing. In the ES cohort, 15 adult pts who had received no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease were recruited. If one confirmed response was observed, recruitment was to be increased to at least 25 evaluable patients. The study treatment was lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 in a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Results: 28 evaluable pts were enrolled. Median age was 33 years (range, 18-74) and 16 (57%) were males. 26 (93%) had an ECOG of 0/1. ES was extraosseous in 15 pts; 7 pts had ≥3 disease sites and 27 had received ≥2 lines of prior chemotherapy. 28 pts received a median of 4 cycles of L (range, 1-12) and a median total dose of 11.9 mg/m2 (range, 3.2-38.4). Efficacy: 4 pts (14.3%) had a partial response and 12 (42.8%) had disease stabilization, 6 of them for ≥4 months. Median duration of the response was 2.9 months (range, 2.9-5.5) and median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (CI 95% 1.4-4.2). Safety: Most common adverse events were related to myelosuppression: 53.6% neutropenia grade (G) 3/4, 14.3% febrile neutropenia, and 18% thrombocytopenia G 3/4; 6 pts had dose delay due to neutropenia G 2-4 or thrombocytopenia G1, and 6 pts had dose reduced because of neutropenia G2-4. G-CSF was given to 12 pts. There were no withdrawals or deaths due to toxicity. Conclusions: L as a single agent has shown activity in pretreated pts with advanced ES, with acceptable safety profile and tolerability. Myelotoxicity was well controlled with dose adjustments and G-CSF. Further and larger studies of L alone or in combination regimens are warranted for pts with advanced ES. Clinical trial information: NCT02454972

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Bone Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02454972

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 11519)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.11519

Abstract #

11519

Poster Bd #

264

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Masahiro Yanagi

First Author: Jose Manuel Trigo Perez

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Safety analysis of lurbinectedin versus topotecan in elderly patients.

First Author: Vivek Subbiah