Prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) mutations in localized prostate cancer according to Gleason grade: Implications for neoadjuvant clinical trial design.

Authors

Catherine Marshall

Catherine Handy

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Catherine Handy , Alexander S Baras , Tamara L. Lotan , Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Organizations

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Background: Approximately 5-10% of men with localized prostate cancer have homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) mutations, yet it is unknown if these vary by Gleason score. In order to help design neoadjuvant trials for the HRD+ population and to minimize the number-needed-to-screen, we sought to determine if the prevalence of HRD mutations is influenced by Gleason grade. Methods: 484 localized prostate adenocarcinoma cases with somatic DNA sequencing data and Gleason grade information were interrogated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. HRD mutations were defined as pathogenic lesions in the following genes: ATM, BRCA1/2, CDK12, CHEK1/2, FANCA, FANCD2, FANCL, GEN1, NBN, PALB2, RAD51 and RAD51C. A separate analysis was also conducted restricting the gene list to BRCA1/2 and ATM, since deficiencies in these genes have the strongest association with PARP-inhibitor response. R software was used for analyses. Results: The prevalence of (any) HRD mutation was 11.6%, 10.8%, 14%, 16.8% and 25.0% for Gleason sums 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, respectively. When analyzed using Grade Groups, the prevalence of (any) HRD mutation was 11.6%, 6%, 17.8%, 14% and 17% for Grade Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively (Table). Those in Grade Group 3 and greater had 2.5 times higher odds of harboring at least one HRD mutation compared to those in Grade Groups 1 and 2 (16.8% vs 7.3%,P= 0.002). When specifically considering only BRCA1/2 or ATM lesions, the mutation prevalence was 6.1 times higher in Grade Group 3 and above compared to Grade Groups 1 and 2 (8.9% vs 1.6%, P= 0.0006) (Table). Conclusions: HRD mutations in general, and BRCA1/2/ATM mutations specifically, are enriched in localized prostate cancers with Gleason Grade Group 3 and higher (i.e. primary pattern 4 and higher). We propose that these patients could be targeted for neoadjuvant (or adjuvant) clinical trials using PARP inhibitors in HRD+ populations.

HRD mutation prevalence by gleason grade group.

Grade GroupAt least 1 HRD mutation
At least 1 BRCA1/2/ATM mutation
NTotalNTotal
111.6 %5432.3%143
26.0 %91491.3%2149
317.8 %1810110.9%11101
414.0 %7508.0%450
517.0 %241417.8%11141

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 5062)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.5062

Abstract #

5062

Poster Bd #

289

Abstract Disclosures

Funded by Conquer Cancer

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Heather H. Cheng

First Author: Muhammad Danyal Ahsan

First Author: June Evelyn Jeon