Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Jesus Vera Aguilera , Jonas Paludo , Anagha Bangalore , Jarrett Failing , Robert R. McWilliams , Lisa A. Kottschade , Matthew Stephen Block , Svetomir Markovic , Roxana Stefania Dronca , Yiyi Yan
Background: Clinical management of metastatic melanoma (MM) after PD-1 blockade failure remains a challenge and lacks a standard of care. Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) combinations have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in lung cancer patients (pts). Our pre-clinical study has shown that in MM pts who have failed PD-1 blockade, the addition of chemotherapy can reshape a subset of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells, resulting in enhanced anti-tumor immune responses. We conducted a retrospective study comparing the clinical outcomes of CIT with immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone after PD-1 blockade failure. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed MM pts seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between Jan, 2012 and Jun, 2017 who had failed anti-PD1 therapy. We identified 48 pts who received subsequent CIT (carboplatin/paclitaxel n = 22; temazolomide n = 1, nab-paclitaxel n = 1), or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or chemotherapy alone. The overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time-to-next therapy (TTNT), and toxicities were assessed between these groups. Results: Among the 48 pts, 24 received CIT after disease progression on PD-1 blockade. At median follow up of 3.9 years, pts who received CIT had a median OS of 5 years (95% CI: 2-NR) versus 1.8 years (95% CI: 0.9-2; p = 0.002) for those who received either ICI (n = 9) or chemotherapy alone (n = 15), with ORR of 61% versus 17% (p = 0.001), respectively. The median TTNT was 8 months (95% CI: 6-15) for CIT cohort versus 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.8-4; p = 0.004) for those who received ICI or chemotherapy alone. Conclusions: In MM pts who have failed anti-PD-1 therapy, the chemo-immunotherapy combination showed favorable clinical outcomes and acceptable toxicity profile. This regimen should be considered for MM pts in this setting who have limited treatment options.
CIT (n = 24) | ICI or Chemotherapy Alone (n = 24) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, median (range) | 54 (30-77) | 57 (21-77) | 0.73 |
Male sex, n (%) | 15 (62) | 14 (58) | 0.76 |
BRAF mutation, n (%) | 10 (41) | 9 (37) | 0.76 |
Brain metastasis, n (%) | 9 (37) | 8 (33) | 0.76 |
ORR, n (%) | 14 (61) | 4 (17) | 0.001 |
Response, n (%) | |||
- CR | 5 (22) | 3 (12) | |
- PR | 9 (39) | 1 (4) | |
- SD | 1 (4) | 2 (8) | |
- PD | 8 (35) | 18 (75) | |
Grade ≥ 3 AE, n (%) | 5 (20) | 5 (20) | 0.71 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2019 ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium
First Author: Jesus Vera Aguilera
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Lujun Shen
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Elio Adib
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Ines Esteves Domingues Pires Da Silva