Impact of National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) and NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) on clinical trial (CT) activities in a community cancer center.

Authors

Mehmet Copur

Mehmet Sitki Copur

CHI Health St. Francis Cancer Treatment Center, Grand Island, NE

Mehmet Sitki Copur , Mary Gulzow , Yuzhen Zhou , Sarah Einspahr , Jennifer Scott , Lauren Murphy , Brenda Broekemeier , Julie Splattstoesser , Ryan C. Ramaekers , David Crockett , Dron Gauchan , Douglas Clark , Angela Mae Obermiller , Max Norvell

Organizations

CHI Health St. Francis Cancer Treatment Center, Grand Island, NE, CHI Health St Francis Cancer Treatment Center, Grand Island, NE, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Within past decade NCI has implemented two major initiatives to improve CT participation and quality of cancer care in the community setting. Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI) St. Francis Cancer Treatment Center in Grand Island Nebraska was one of the privileged community cancer centers to participate in both programs. Methods: During the last 3 years of NCCCP and first 3 years of NCORP, data on CT activities including number/percent of patients, underserved populations on CTs, number/type of CTs, staffing, organizational infrastructure/linkage to National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN), and access to cancer treatment (CRx), cancer control/prevention (CC/P), cancer care delivery (CCDR) trials were gathered and compared. Results: CT enrollment increased from 512 (30%) during NCCCP to 518 (36%) during NCORP (P = 0.0005). All patients were rural Nebraskans, 70% older than 60. Total CTs increased from 45 during NCCCP to 125 during NCORP. Major increases in NCTN trials/accruals were seen during NCORP. Staffing increased by two. Organizational infrastructure/linkage to cooperative group (CG) trials was with CALGB through an academic affiliation and academic IRB during NCCCP and with ECOG-ACRIN, SWOG, NRG, ALLIANCE through CHI-NCORP and central IRB of NCI and/or CHI during NCORP. Conclusions: Participation in both NCI programs positively impacted CT related activities and expanded research with enhanced access to quality cancer care. NCORP provided a robust NCTN linkage resulting in a record high CT portfolio. This preliminary comparison between two strong NCI initiatives may help for design of future programs.

ActivityJuly 2011-June 2014
Last 3-year NCCCP
July 2014-June 2017
First 3-year NCORP
P
# Staff (FTE)790.02*
∑ # Accruals (range)512 (140-230)518 (107-213)
∑% Accruals (range)30 (26-34)36 (23-42)0.0005*
∑ # CG Trials / ∑ # Accruals23 / 3698 / 1510.09
# CRx / # Accruals18 / 2681 / 1140.03*
# CC/P / # Accruals2 / 811 / 210.41
# CCDR / # Accruals03 / 160.25
# Biospecimen / # Accruals3 / 23 / 00.91
# Industry / # Accruals10 / 918 / 270.33
# Investigator Initiated / # Accruals12 / 4679 / 3400.96
45/512125/518

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Care Delivery/Models of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr e18500)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e18500

Abstract #

e18500

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Dhaval Patel

Abstract

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

ASCO Research Community Forum: Impact on clinical research.

First Author: David Michael Waterhouse