Evaluation of rucaparib in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma (rOC) in patients (pts) with or without residual bulky disease at baseline in the ARIEL3 study.

Authors

Carol Aghajanian

Carol Aghajanian

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Carol Aghajanian , Robert L. Coleman , Amit M. Oza , Domenica Lorusso , Ana Oaknin , Andrew Peter Dean , Nicoletta Colombo , Johanne I Weberpals , Andrew R. Clamp , Giovanni Scambia , Alexandra Leary , Robert W. Holloway , Peter C.C. Fong , Jeffrey C. Goh , David M. O'Malley , Susana N. Banerjee , Kenton Wride , Teresa Cameron , Jonathan A. Ledermann

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and MITO, Milan, Italy, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, Saint John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Australia, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, Università Cattolica Roma, Rome, Italy, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, and Groupe D'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Villejuif, France, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, and University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, UCL Cancer Institute and UCL Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In ARIEL3, pts were randomized 2:1 (oral rucaparib 600 mg or placebo). Rucaparib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in all primary analysis groups (Coleman et al. Lancet. 2017;390:1949-61). An exploratory subgroup analysis of ARIEL3 pts with or without bulky residual disease ( > 2 cm per blinded independent central review [BICR]) at baseline is reported. Methods: Pts were assigned to 2 analysis subgroups: with or without bulky residual disease at baseline. PFS was assessed in 3 predefined cohorts: BRCA mutant; homologous recombination deficient (HRD) (BRCA mutant or BRCA wild type/high loss of heterozygosity); and intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: PFS data for each subgroup (visit cutoff date 15 Apr 2017) by status of bulky disease at baseline are summarized in the Table. Safety data were consistent with data reported previously. In the rucaparib arm, the most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event in pts with and pts without bulky disease was anemia (20.0% and 18.5%, respectively). Clinical trial information: NCT01968213  Conclusions: Rucaparib improved PFS vs placebo in all 3 predefined cohorts for both pts with and without bulky residual disease. PFS benefit with rucaparib was largest in pts with BRCA-mutant rOC.

CohortRucaparib, nPlacebo, nPFS (investigator review)
PFS (BICR)
HR
(95% CI)
Median PFS, mo;
P value*
HR
(95% CI)
Median PFS, mo;
Pvalue*
Rucaparib vs placeboRucaparib vs placebo
Bulky disease at baseline (per BICR)
Yes
BRCA mutant21100.09
(0.02–0.37)
11.1 vs 2.8;
P= 0.0002
0.13
(0.03–0.55)
17.1 vs 2.9;
P= 0.0028
HRD39180.30
(0.13–0.69)
8.3 vs 2.8;
P= 0.0030
0.58
(0.25–1.34)
8.3 vs 2.9;
P= 0.1994
ITT71290.40
(0.24–0.69)
8.2 vs 2.9;
P= 0.0007
0.46
(0.26–0.81)
8.3 vs 3.0;
P= 0.0057
No
BRCA mutant109560.26
(0.17–0.40)
16.6 vs 5.6;
P< 0.0001
0.22
(0.13–0.37)
26.8 vs 5.5;
P< 0.0001
HRD1971000.31
(0.23–0.43)
13.8 vs 5.5;
P< 0.0001
0.32
(0.22–0.47)
24.7 vs 5.6;
P< 0.0001
ITT3041600.36
(0.29–0.46)
11.0 vs 5.4;
P< 0.0001
0.34
(0.26–0.45)
16.2 vs 5.4;
P< 0.0001

*Stratified log-rank P value.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01968213

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 5537)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.5537

Abstract #

5537

Poster Bd #

264

Abstract Disclosures