Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Rana R. McKay , Wanling Xie , Rosina Lis , Huihui Ye , Zhenwei Zhang , Quoc-Dien Trinh , Steven Lee Chang , Lauren Christine Harshman , Ashley Ross , Kenneth J. Pienta , Daniel W. Lin , William J Ellis , Robert B. Montgomery , Peter Chang , Andrew Wagner , Glenn Bubley , Adam S. Kibel , Mary-Ellen Taplin
Background: Patients with high-risk PC have an increased risk of recurrence and mortality despite therapy. Abiraterone, a CYP17 inhibitor, and enzalutamide, a next generation anti-androgen, have demonstrated improved overall survival in metastatic PC. In this multicenter randomized phase II trial, we evaluate the impact of second generation hormone therapy on RP pathologic outcomes. Methods: Eligible patients had biopsy Gleason score ≥4+3=7, PSA >20 ng/mL or cT3 disease (by prostate MRI). Lymph node were require to be <20 mm. Patients were randomized 2:1 to APE:EL for 6 cycles (24 weeks) followed by RP. All RPs underwent central pathology review. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimum residual disease (MRD, tumor ≤5 mm). Secondary endpoints include PSA response, surgical staging at RP, positive margin rate, and safety. Results: 75 patients were enrolled at four sites: DFCI/BWH (n=55), BIDMC (n=11), UW (n=5), JHU (n=4). Median age was 62 years. Most patients had NCCN high-risk disease [n=66, 88%; cT3 n=21 (28%), Gleason 8-10 n=59 (79%), PSA >20 ng/mL n=17 (23%)]. All patients completed 6 cycles followed by RP. Median PSA nadir was 0.03 and 0.02 ng/mL and time to nadir was 3.7 and 4.6 months in the APEL and EL arms, respectively. The combined pCR or MRD rate was 30% (n=15/50) in the APEL arm and 16% (n=4/25) in the EL arm. The response difference was 14% (80% CI -3%-30%, p=0.263). 15 patients (14 in APEL; 1 in EL) had grade 3 adverse events (AEs). The most common grade 3 AEs were hypertension (n=7) and ALT increase (n=5). No grade 4-5 AEs occurred. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant hormone therapy plus RP in men with high-risk PC resulted in favorable pathologic responses (≤5 mm residual tumor) in 16-30% with a trend towards improved pathologic outcomes with APEL and acceptable safety profile. Follow-up is necessary to evaluate the impact of therapy on recurrence rates. Clinical trial information: NCT02268175
APEL (n=50) | EL (n=25) | Total (n=75) | |
---|---|---|---|
pT2 | 38% | 36% | 37% |
pT3 | 50% | 56% | 52% |
+ Margins | 18% | 12% | 16% |
+ Seminal Vesicles | 18% | 28% | 21% |
+ Lymph Nodes | 10% | 12% | 11% |
pCR | 12% | 8% | 11% |
MRD | 18% | 8% | 15% |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Rana R. McKay
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Karan Jatwani
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Karan Jatwani
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Junlong Zhuang