The importance of the need for better systemic therapy in the definitive treatment of high-risk prostate cancer regardless of whether the initial treatment modality was external beam radiation, I-125 brachytherapy, or radical prostatectomy.

Authors

null

Jay P. Ciezki

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Jay P. Ciezki , Chandana A. Reddy , Omar Y. Mian , Jorge A. Garcia , Eric A. Klein , James Ulchaker , Kenneth Angermeier , Steven C. Campbell , Andrew J. Stephenson

Organizations

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH, Virginia Commonwealth University, Millersville, MD, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urology and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

Other

Background: While androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a common form of systemic therapy for treating high-risk prostate cancer (HRCaP), distant metastases development remains the predominate form of failure. We present a description of the sites of failure after treatment of HRCaP with External Beam Radiation (EBRT), I-125 Brachytherapy (PB), or Radical Prostatectomy (RP). This is accompanied by an analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after clinical failure. Methods: The study includes 2186 patients with HRCaP according to NCCN guidelines (684 EBRT, 409 PB, and 1093 RP). The association of PCSM with clinical and pathologic variables was assessed with Fine and Gray regression with non-PCSM mortality treated as a competing event. Results: The median f/u is 52 months. Overall, there were 323 clinical failures (sites of first failures: 287 distant (DM), 34 local (LF), 2 DM + LF). The median time to the diagnosis of DM was 44 months. ADT was used in 93% of EBRT, 53% of PB and 19% of RP patients. Further details regarding the development of DM is shown in Table 1. The type of initial treatment was not associated with PCSM after DM (Table 1). The only factor significantly associated with PCSM was Gleason Score (p = 0.0372). Conclusions: DM is the primary mode of failure after definitive treatment of HRCaP. The type of initial definitive treatment did not affect PCSM after DM. The cure rates of all forms of definitive treatment of HRCaP would benefit from better systemic therapy.

EBRT (n)EBRT (%)PB (n)PB (%)RP (n)RP (%)P-value
First Site of Distant Metastases
Bone9167.91641.08365.9N/A
Lymph Nodes2820.91538.53225.4N/A
Lymph Nodes & Bone129.0615.497.1N/A
Visceral32.225.121.6N/A
Total13439126N/A
Rates for Bone Metastases
10315.1225.4928.40.0100
Rates for Lymph Node Metastases
405.8215.1413.80.2161
HRCaP mortality after DM
Alive3828.42666.76450.40.1995
Dead of HRCaP7455.21128.24837.8
Non-HRCaP Death2216.425.11511.8

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 65)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.65

Abstract #

65

Poster Bd #

D7

Abstract Disclosures