Effect of germline DNA repair gene mutations on outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide.

Authors

null

Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

Emmanuel S. Antonarakis , Changxue Lu , Brandon Luber , Hao Wang , Yan Chen , John Silberstein , Danilo Piana , Zhao Lai , Yidong Chen , William B. Isaacs , Jun Luo

Organizations

Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, UT Health Science Center at San Antonio, Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, San Antonio, TX

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Inherited DNA repair gene mutations are more prevalent in men with advanced prostate cancer than previously thought, but their clinical implications are not fully understood. Here we investigated the clinical significance of germline DNA repair gene alterations in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving first-line novel hormonal therapy (NHT), with a particular emphasis on BRCA1/2 and ATM mutations. Methods: We interrogated 50 DNA repair genes for pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline mutations using leukocyte DNA from 172 mCRPC patients beginning treatment with first-line NHT: abiraterone or enzalutamide. We assessed the impact of germline DNA repair gene mutation status on ≥50% and ≥90% PSA response rates, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical/radiologic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were adjusted using propensity score-weighted multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: Among 172 mCRPC patients, germline mutations (in any DNA repair gene) were found in 12.8% (22/172) of men, and germline BRCA/ATM mutations were found in 5.2% (9/172) of men. In unadjusted analyses, outcomes to first-line NHT were better in men with germline BRCA/ATM mutations (vs. no mutations) with respect to ≥90% PSA responses (78% vs. 28%, P = 0.004), PSA-PFS (HR 0.47, P = 0.061), PFS (HR 0.50, P = 0.090) and OS (HR 0.28, P = 0.059). In propensity score-weighted multivariable analyses, outcomes remained superior in men with germline BRCA/ATM mutations with respect to PSA-PFS (HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.25–0.92, P = 0.027), PFS (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.28–0.98, P = 0.044) and OS (HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.12–0.99, P = 0.048), but this was not true for men with non-BRCA/ATM germline mutations (all endpoints, P> 0.10). Conclusions: Outcomes to first line NHT appeared better in mCRPC patients harboring germline BRCA/ATM mutations (vs. no mutations), but not for patients with other non-BRCA/ATM germline mutations. These results support the hypothesis that AR may promote DNA repair, and that inhibiting AR in the context of homologous recombination deficiency may lead to synthetic lethality.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 221)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.221

Abstract #

221

Poster Bd #

K19

Abstract Disclosures