Genomic alterations to refine prognostication of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors

Dominick Bosse

Dominick Bosse

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Dominick Bosse , Wanling Xie , Aly-Khan A. Lalani , Guillermo de Velasco , Martin Henner Voss , Nizar M. Tannir , Pheroze Tamboli , Leonard Joseph Appleman , Kimryn Rathmell , Daniel Yick Chin Heng , Guru Sonpavde , Sabina Signoretti , A. Ari Hakimi , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, Vanderbilt University Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/ Brigham and Women’s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other

Background: The IMDC risk score is a valid and simple tool to prognosticate patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Some non-VHL common genomic alterations may be associated with outcomes. We therefore assessed the prognostic value of most commonly mutated genes in mRCC beside VHL overall, and within IMDC risk groups. Methods: We identified patients treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (n = 65) or part of TCGA (n = 33) who had genomic data available and were treated with first line vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Information on genomic alterations (GA) focused on PBRM1, BAP1, SETD2, KDM5C and TP53 was extracted. Cox regression was performed to assess the association of each GA with overall survival (OS), adjusting for IMDC risk groups and age. Results: Overall, 98 pts were identified. 96/98 pts had clear-cell histology. Pts distribution by IMDC risk groups was: 7% good, 58% intermediate, 27% poor and 8% unknown. Mutation rates were 27% PBRM1, 17% BAP1, 29% SETD2, 9% KDM5C and 8% TP53. In multivariable models, there was an association between GA and worse OS for BAP1 and BAP1 or TP53 combined (Table). When stratified by IMDC risk groups, GA in BAP1 or TP53 was associated with shorter median OS in poor risk pts [12.1 mo (95%CI 8.3- 24.0) v. 27.6 mo (95%CI 18.9- 53.4), aHR 4.64 (95%CI 1.32-16.4), p = 0.017] and a trend toward worse median OS in intermediate risk pts [20.5 mo (95%CI 7.4-54.6) v. 36.3 mo (95%CI 21.1, NR), aHR 2.11 (95%CI 0.94-4.74)] compared to pts without GA in BAP1 or TP53. Too few death events were observed in good risk pts to assess the prognostic value of GA in BAP1 or TP53. Conclusions: GA in BAP1 or TP53 are prognostic in mRCC and further discriminate pts with distinct outcomes within IMDC risk groups. Validation in larger dataset is ongoing.

GAsN (N event)Adjusted HR* for OSp-value
PBRM1072(43)Ref
125(12)0.85(0.44-1.63)0.621
BAP1080(43)Ref
117(12)1.98(1.00-3.91)0.049
SETD2069(39)Ref
128(16)1.03(0.56-1.90)0.920
KDM5C088(50)Ref
19(5)1.03(0.41-2.61)0.956
TP53089(50)Ref
18(5)1.90(0.73-4.95)0.189
BAP1(+) or TP53(+)074(39)Ref
123(16)2.24(1.21-4.15)0.010

*adjusted for IMDC risk group and age

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 626)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.626

Abstract #

626

Poster Bd #

G19

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Genomic alterations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Impact on survival and clinical outcomes.

First Author: Jennifer King

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Genomic and immune landscape of biliary tract cancers with ARID1A, PBRM1, and BAP1 alterations.

First Author: Gentry Teng King

Abstract

2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

Alterations in key clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) genes to refine patient prognosis.

First Author: Dominick Bossé