Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Maha Hussain , Karim Fizazi , Fred Saad , Per Rathenborg , Neal D. Shore , Eren Demirhan , Katharina Modelska , De Phung , Andrew Krivoshik , Cora N. Sternberg
Background: Men with M0 CRPC and rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are at high risk of developing metastatic (M1) CRPC. ENZA improves overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival in men with M1 CRPC. We hypothesized that ENZA will improve metastasis-free survival (MFS) in men with M0 CRPC. Methods: Eligible men with M0 CRPC, PSA doubling time ≤ 10 mo and PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL at screening continued androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and were randomized 2:1 to ENZA 160 mg or PBO. The primary endpoint was MFS. Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression, time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy, OS and safety. Results: In 1401 men, ENZA significantly prolonged median MFS (36.6 mo vs 14.7 mo [P< .0001]), time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy (39.6 mo vs 17.7 mo [P< .0001]) and time to PSA progression (37.2 mo vs 3.9 mo [P< .0001]) compared to PBO (Table). In the first interim analysis of OS there was a trend in favor of ENZA (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; P = .1519). Median duration of treatment was 18.4 mo vs 11.1 mo for ENZA vs PBO. Adverse events (AEs) were higher with ENZA vs PBO (any grade: 87% vs 77%; grade ≥ 3: 31% vs 23%; serious: 24% vs 18%); 10% with ENZA discontinued treatment due to AE vs 8% with PBO. Conclusions: In men with M0 CRPC and rapidly rising PSA, ENZA treatment resulted in a clinically meaningful and statistically significant 71% reduction in the risk of developing M1 CRPC. AEs were consistent with the established safety profile of ENZA. Clinical trial information: NCT02003924
Baseline Characteristic | ENZA + ADT (n = 933) | PBO + ADT (n = 468) |
---|---|---|
Age, median, y | 74 | 73 |
PSA doubling time < 6 mo, no. (%) | 715 (77) | 361 (77) |
Serum PSA, ng/mL | 11.1 | 10.2 |
Endpoint | ||
MFS,a median (95% CI), mo | 36.6 (33.1-NR) | 14.7 (14.2-15.0) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.29 (0.24-0.35) | |
P value | < .0001 | |
Time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy,a median (95% CI), mo | 39.6 (37.7-NR) | 17.7 (16.2-19.7) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.21 (0.17-0.26) | |
P value | < .0001 | |
Time to PSA progression,a median (95% CI), mo | 37.2 (33.1-NR) | 3.9 (3.8-4.0) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.07 (0.05-0.08) | |
P value | < .0001 | |
OS,b median (95% CI), mo | NR (NR-NR) | NR (NR-NR) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.80 (0.58-1.09) | |
P value | .1519 |
aFinal analysis; binterim analysis CI, confidence interval; NR, not reached
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Maha H. A. Hussain
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Cora N. Sternberg
2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Axel S. Merseburger
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Neeraj Agarwal