Treatment patterns for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) progressing after up-front docetaxel in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (D-ADT).

Authors

Pedro Barata

Pedro C. Barata

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Pedro C. Barata , Hamid Emamekhoo , Prateek Mendiratta , Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan , Vadim S. Koshkin , Allison Janine Tyler , Moshe Chaim Ornstein , Petros Grivas , Timothy D. Gilligan , Brian I. Rini , Christos Kyriakopoulos , Jorge A. Garcia

Organizations

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Insitute, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

Research Funding

Other

Background: D-ADT increases overall survival (OS) in men with mHSPC. All patients (pts) however progress and develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Little is known about response to subsequent therapy and outcomes in this setting. Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive mHSPC pts treated with ≥3 cycles of D-ADT at Cleveland Clinic and University of Wisconsin-Madison. We aimed to describe baseline, progression characteristics, treatment choices, sequence and outcome of subsequent therapy. Results: A total of 146 mHSPC pts were treated with D-ADT (6% 1-2 cycles; 94% ≥3 cycles). Final analysis included 136 pts, median age 65 (range 35-86), 65% GS≥8, 79% high-volume disease. Median number of D cycles was 6 (1-6). PSA declined to “0” at 12 and 24 months in 32% and 25% of pts, respectively. Median time to CRPC (biochemical, clinical or radiographic) was 19.6 months (95% CI, 16.6-22.6). 57 pts (42%) received ≥1 subsequent treatment after CRPC [46 hormonal therapy (HT) (21 abiraterone acetate, 19 enzalutamide, 6 ASN-001); 4 Sipuleucel-T; 4 radium-223, 5 chemotherapy (2 carboplatin-based, 2 cabazitaxel, 1 D); 3 temsirolimus/bevacizumab]. Treatment response was independent from time to CRPC (≥12 months, p = 0.264). Pts receiving HT as the first subsequent treatment had a median rPFS of 13.3 months (95% CI, 10.1-16.5) compared with 3.1 months (95% CI, 0-15.8) for non-HT (p = 0.332). Treatment choice was independent of GS (p = 0.513), visceral disease (p = 0.374) and time to CRPC (p = 0.500). Most CRPC pts treated with ≥2 lines of therapy received one HT (n = 21) followed by a different HT (43%), chemo (38%), radium-223 (14%) or olaparib (10%). 57% of pts were alive at 2 years. Longer OS correlated with time to CRPC (p = 0.010) and first subsequent treatment with HT (p = 0.009) but not with visceral disease (p = 0.258), GS (p = 0.599) or sequence of therapies received (HT/HT vs HT/non-HT, p = 0.836). Conclusions: Prior D-ADT did not preclude subsequent treatment response in CRPC pts, independent of time to CRPC. The choice of first-line treatment for CRPC may impact survival in favor of those who start HT.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer, Urothelial Carcinoma, and Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer,Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr 305)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.305

Abstract #

305

Poster Bd #

B16

Abstract Disclosures