SM-88 therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors

null

Steve Hoffman

Tyme Technologies, Inc., New York, NY

Steve Hoffman , Jeanetta Stega , Patricia Zawisny , Zachary Gostout , Giuseppe Del Priore , Maria Loushin , Ben R Taylor

Organizations

Tyme Technologies, Inc., New York, NY, Quality Research and Invention LLC, New York, NY, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: SM-88 (tyrosine derivative, mTOR inhibitor, CYP3a4 inducer and oxidative stress catalyst) is a relatively non-toxic, targeted therapy that utilizes the Warburg Effect in combination with oxidative stress to cause tumor cell death. Previously reported results (Phase I and preliminary Phase II) showed safety and efficacy for SM-88 in metastatic and recurrent cancers. Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor prognosis with toxic standard of care (SOC) therapies, associated serious adverse events (SAEs), and QOL degradation. SM-88 is being evaluated as a minimally toxic alternative treatment. Methods: Retrospective chart review between 2012-17 of 12 patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with SM-88 through a Phase 1 study (3/12) or compassionate use (9/12) with 10/12 evaluable. Although treatment regimens specifics varied, all were provided SM-88 therapy five days a week, administered by clinicians, orally or through subcutaneous injection; 7/10 patients received SM-88 mono therapy; and 3/10 received combination therapy (5FU-based). Results: 40% (4/10) of patients achieved survival benefit of greater than one year (mean 12.2 mo) (see table). Monotherapy patients maintained or improved ECOG PS and did not experience drug-related SAEs during treatment. 2/10 patients achieved partial responses. One patient maintained rPFS for 13 months despite positive margins post-surgery and elevated CA19.9 levels. Conclusions: SM-88 appears well tolerated and demonstrated notable survival times in comparison to expected SOC therapies. In addition, several of the patients demonstrating benefit had baseline ECOG PSs of 2, for which current SOC is palliative care only. For further evaluation, a North American Phase II trial in recurrent pancreatic cancer has been initiated.

PatientBaseline
ECOG
Best ECOG on SM-88Previous Treatments*Months of SM-88 MonotherapyOS
0370-10S, R, C(1)245
01810S1824
09621C(1)16.5 (Comb)16
0842-30S1315
08621n/a3 (Comb)5
0312-31C(1)44
04710C(1)44
10711C(5)24
0942n/aC(3)2.5 (Comb)3
0142-31S22

* S = surgery, R = radiotherapy, C = chemotherapy (Number of lines), Comb = SM88 combined with SOC chemotherapy

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 4S; abstr 457)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.4_suppl.457

Abstract #

457

Poster Bd #

M4

Abstract Disclosures