BCLC Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, CIBEREHD, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
Jordi Bruix , Philippe Merle , Alessandro Granito , Yi-Hsiang Huang , Gyorgy Bodoky , Osamu Yokosuka , Olivier Rosmorduc , Valeriy Vladimirovich Breder , René Gerolami , Gianluca Masi , Paul J. Ross , Shukui Qin , Tianqiang Song , Jean-Pierre Bronowicki , Isabelle Ollivier-Hourmand , Masatoshi Kudo , Lei Xu , Annette Baumhauer , Gerold Meinhardt , Guohong Han
Background: Skin toxicity is a known adverse effect of multikinase inhibitors, and was shown to be a predictor of OS in patients (pts) with HCC treated with sorafenib (Reig M, 2014). In the RESORCE trial, regorafenib improved OS versus placebo in pts with HCC progressing on sorafenib (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50, 0.78; Bruix J, 2017). This retrospective analysis explored whether HFSR with regorafenib was associated with OS in RESORCE. Methods: Pts in RESORCE who were randomized to regorafenib 160 mg/day during the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle were divided into subgroups based on whether or not they had HFSR. Estimates of OS (95% CI) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Pts who were randomized, but not treated, were included in the no HFSR group for the analysis of survival. Results: Of 379 pts randomized, 374 received at least one dose of regorafenib. Of the treated pts, 53% (n = 199) had HFSR of any grade and 13% (n = 47) had grade 3 HFSR. Among pts with HFSR at any time during the study, 77% (n = 153) had the first HFSR event (any grade) during Cycle 1. Subgroups of pts with and without HFSR at any time had some imbalances in baseline characteristics (Table). OS was improved in pts who had HFSR at any time versus those who did not (Table). Pts who had a HFSR event during Cycle 1 also had improved OS versus those who did not (median OS 13.2 vs 8.5 months; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51, 0.86). Conclusions: In this post-hoc exploratory analysis, HFSR with regorafenib was associated with improved OS, as was previously shown for sorafenib. The potential confounding influence of baseline factors requires further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT01774344
HFSR (any grade; n = 199) | No HFSR (n = 180) | |
---|---|---|
Median age, yrs (range) | 61 (21–84) | 65 (19–85) |
Geographic region Asia/rest of world, % | 50/50 | 24/76 |
ECOG performance status 0/1, % | 75/25 | 54/46 |
BCLC stage A/B/C, %* | 1/17/83 | 0/11/89 |
AFP ≥400 ng/mL, % | 40 | 46 |
Macrovascular invasion (MVI), % | 24 | 35 |
Extrahepatic disease (EHD), % | 68 | 72 |
MVI and/or EHD, % | 77 | 83 |
Child–Pugh score 5/6/7, % | 76/22/2 | 51/47/1† |
Median OS, months (95% CI) | 14.1 (11.7, 16.5) | 6.6 (5.0, 8.5) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.52 (0.40, 0.67) |
*Numbers may not sum to 100 due to rounding; †Child–Pugh score missing in 1 pt.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Laura A. Dawson
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Jamie Partridge
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Atsuo Takashima
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Philippe Merle