Randomized phase II study to compare docetaxel plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in advanced gastric cancer without measurable lesions (HERBIS-3).

Authors

null

Jin Matsuyama

Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan

Jin Matsuyama , Yukinori Kurokawa , Kazuhiro Nishikawa , Yutaka Kimura , Atsushi Takeno , Junji Kawada , Ryohei Kawabata , Youichi Makari , Shigeyuki Tamura , Yuichiro Doki , Daisuke Sakai , Toshio Shimokawa , Taroh Satoh

Organizations

Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan, Kaizuka City Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan, Sakai City Medical Center, Sakai, Japan, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Research Funding

Other

Background: Cisplatin and S-1 (CS) regimen is one of the standard chemotherapy as first-line for advanced gastric cancer. Docetaxel is a well-known agent with high anti-tumor effect for peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer. A previous phase III study showed docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) regimen was recommended especially for advanced gastric cancer without measurable lesions. However, there was no study comparing the efficacy and safety of these two regimens. Methods: Eligibility criteria included HER2-negative unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma, no measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1, no massive peritoneal metastasis, no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, age ≤75, PS 0-2, adequate oral intake, and preserved organ functions. Patients were randomized to receive CS (cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 8, S-1 40–60 mg twice a day for 3 weeks, every 5 weeks) or DS (docetaxel 40 mg/m² on day 1, S-1 40–60 mg twice a day for 2 weeks, every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. Results: Sixty-one patients were randomly allocated the CS group (n = 31) or the DS group (n = 30) between Aug 2011 and Sep 2015. All were unresectable primary cases, and baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. One patient was ineligible due to HER2-positive. There was no treatment-related death. The main grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (27% in CS vs. 40% in DS), anemia (10% in CS vs. 10% in DS), fatigue (13% in CS vs. 7% in DS), anorexia (10% in CS vs. 3% in DS), and diarrhea (10% in CS vs. 3% in DS). The median OS time were 15.8 months in CS and 20.0 months in DS, respectively (log-rank P = 0.113). Hazard ratio for OS was 0.617 (95%CI, 0.337 – 1.128). The median PFS time were 9.6 months in CS and 11.2 months in DS, respectively (log-rank P = 0.196). Hazard ratio for PFS was 0.698 (95%CI, 0.404 – 1.208). Conclusions: DS showed less toxic and more active profiles than CS for treatment of advanced gastric cancer without measurable lesions. The clinical benefit of DS regimen should be demonstrated in a phase III study. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006179.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Track

Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Clinical Trial Registration Number

UMIN000006179

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 4S; abstr 119)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.4_suppl.119

Abstract #

119

Poster Bd #

H23

Abstract Disclosures