Evaluation of the MiCheck MIA test performance in differentiating aggressive from non-aggressive prostate cancer: The MiCheck-01 prospective trial.

Authors

null

Neal D. Shore

Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC

Neal D. Shore , Christopher Michael Pieczonka , Ralph Jonathan Henderson , James L. Bailen , Jennifer Lynn Beebe-Dimmer , Julie J. Ruterbusch , Daniel R. Saltzstein , Raoul S. Concepcion , Robert Borotkanics , Rachel Levin , Sandra Wissmueller , Douglas Campbell , Brad Walsh

Organizations

Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, Associated Medical Professionals of New York, PLLC, Syracuse, NY, Regional Urology, LLC, Shreveport, LA, First Urology Research, Louisville, KY, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, Urology San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, Urology Associates, PC, Nashville, TN, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand, Minomic International Ltd, Macquarie Park, Australia, Minomic International Ltd, Macqaurie Park, Australia, Minomic International Ltd, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: A diagnostic test which can better inform both clinicians and patients regarding a decision to proceed with a prostate biopsy, while still utilizing traditional parameters of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) kinetics and/or the digital rectal examination (DRE) is still an unmet need. The MiCheck® test is designed as a triage test to assist clinicians in the decision to proceed to prostate biopsy. The MiCheck®test is a simple blood test that measures the levels of the Glypican-1 protein and related signalling molecules. The MiCheck®-01 prospective trial builds on a previous pilot trial that examined the ability of the MiCheck® test to distinguish between normal subjects, patients with benign disease or Gleason 7 and above prostate cancer. The MiCheck® test showed sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 96% in distinguishing between subjects with Gleason ≥7 and normal or BPH patients. In a separate study, the MiCheck® test could differentiate aggressive (GS ≥3+4) from non-aggressive (GS 3+3) prostate cancer with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 90%. Methods: The trial consists of two arms: Arm 1 (normal patients, n = 50) and Arm 2 (prostate biopsy patients, n = 300). Inclusion criteria:Arm 1: Age ≥50, Low PSA (performed at most 12 months prior, defined as PSA < 1.5 ng/mL between ages 50 and 60 and PSA < 3 ng/mL above age 60). Arm2: Age ≥40, all subjects who are referred for or have undergone either a de novo or a repeat prostate biopsy for high PSA (defined as PSA ≥ 1 ng/ml between ages 40 and 49, PSA ≥2 ng/mL between ages 50 and 60 and PSA ≥ 3 ng/mL for age 60 and above age 60). Key exclusion criteria: prior history of cancer, patients taking ADT, DRE or other prostate manipulation within 72 hrs, subjects taking 5 ARIs. Results: The trial has recruited 30 Arm 2 patients to date. Interim analyses will be performed following accrual of 100 and 200 Arm 2 patients. Full accrual is expected by mid Q4 2017. Conclusions: Interim analysis data will be presented showing test performance. COI and Funding: The trial is funded by Minomic International Ltd. Neal Shore is a member of Minomic’s Clinical Advisory Panel.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Trials in Progress Poster Session

Session Title

Trials in Progress Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer,Prostate Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer - Localized Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 6S; abstr TPS152)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.6_suppl.TPS152

Abstract #

TPS152

Poster Bd #

N15

Abstract Disclosures