The prognostic role of CpG island methylator phenotype in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors

null

Kuo-Hsing Chen

National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Huwei Township, Taiwan

Kuo-Hsing Chen , Liang-In Lin , Li-Hui Tseng , Yu-Lin Lin , Jau-Yu Liau , Jia-Huei Tsai , Jin-Tung Liang , Been-Ren Lin , Ann-Lii Cheng , Kun-Huei Yeh

Organizations

National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Huwei Township, Taiwan, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan

Research Funding

Other

Background: The prognostic role of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial, especially in metastatic CRC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in stage I to IV CRC specimens, which were diagnosed during 2005-2013. CIMP status was determined using a 5- gene MethyLight-based assay (p16, MINT1, MINT2, MINT31, and MLH1). Tumors were designated as CIMP if 3 or more of 5 genes gave percent of methylated reference value ≧ 10. The clinicopatholoical characteristics, anti-cancer therapies, and the overall survival outcome were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with CIMP CRC and those with non-CIMP CRC. Results: Among 450 patients with successfully determined CIMP status, 259 (57.56%) were male, 312 (70.31%) were stages I-III, 316 (70.69%) were left-sided CRC. In the survival analyses in stages I-IV patients, there was no significant difference in OS between those with or without CIMP (long rank test, p = 0.4526). Importantly, patients with metastatic CIMP CRC had poor OS than those with metastatic non-CIMP CRC (median survival, CIMP vs. non-CIMP: 1.36 vs. 3.11 years, log rank test, p = 0.0047). In a multivariate analysis, which adjusted prognostic variables such as: KRAS and BRAF mutations, microsatellite instability status, age, sex, grade, primary site, metastatic site number, chemotherapies and targeted therapies, CIMP remained an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (HR = 6.213, 95% confidence interval: 2.443 to 15.799, p = 0.0001) in metastatic CRC. In an exploratory analysis, there were more tumors with liver metastases at diagnosis in CIMP CRC than in non-CIMP CRC (94.4% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.0416).Conclusions: Our data demonstrated CIMP might independently predict poor survival in metastatic CRC in a large East Asian cohort.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2018 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Translational Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl 4S; abstr 667)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2018.36.4_suppl.667

Abstract #

667

Poster Bd #

F4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Takeshi Yamada

Abstract

2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Prognostic effect of RAS/BRAF mutations in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

First Author: Haisam Abid

Abstract

2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

The prevalence of common KRAS variants and associated outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

First Author: Laura W. Musselwhite

First Author: Eleonora Lai