The effect of nurse-led pain education of patients with painful bone metastases on pain and quality of life: A multicenter randomized trial.

Authors

null

Jenske I. Geerling

University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

Jenske I. Geerling, Natasja Raijmakers, Veronique E.M. Mul, Ellen JM de Nijs, Marianne A Oudhof, Gertruida Hendrika de Bock, Alexander De Graeff, Yvette M van der Linden, Anna K.L. Reyners

Organizations

University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, Netherlands, Leids University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective treatment for painful bone metastases, although pain is not always sufficiently controlled. Pain management education may improve patient empowerment and, consequently, reduce pain intensity. The effect of nurse-led education (NLE) in patients undergoing RT for painful bone metastases was investigated as compared to care as usual (CAU). Primary endpoint was pain intensity at 12 weeks, secondary outcome was quality of life (QoL). Methods: In this multicentre, randomised phase 3 study, patients referred for short schedule RT, with uncontrolled pain (a score of ≥5 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)), were randomised between NLE or CAU before start of RT. The NLE consisted of a structured interview including assessment of pain knowledge, verbal and written education on all aspects of pain and follow-up phone calls at 1, 4, 8 & 12 weeks to address pain-related questions. Patients in CAU received leaflets on RT, cancer pain and opioid use. Patient characteristics were assessed at baseline. Pain intensity and QoL were evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and EORTC QLQ-BM22 at baseline, and week 1, 4, 8 & 12. Power calculation showed that there were 89 patients per arm needed to detect a 10% difference in number of patients with a NRS < 5 at 12 weeks(1-sided α = 0.05; β 0.8). Results: Between May 2011-April 2016, 354 patients were randomised (176 NLE, 178 CAU), 38 were excluded (30 NRS < 5 at baseline, 7 no short schedule RT, 1 missing informed consent). At twelve weeks, 185 (NLE 95) had completed follow-up (72 stopped filling out questionnaires, 59 died prematurely). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups; mean age 65 years, 56% men. At week 12, more patients in NLE than in CAU had controlled pain (NRS < 5; respectively 66% and 52%, p = 0.036). Moreover, patients in NLE reached faster a pain score < 5 than patients in CAU (31 versus 54 days respectively, p = 0.026). On all time points, no significant differences in QoL were found between both groups. Conclusions: Controlled pain, i.e. a pain intensity < 5, was reached faster and by more patients with painful bone metastases undergoing RT by the addition of nurse-led pain education. Clinical trial information: NCT01358539

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management,Caregiver Support

Sub Track

Symptom Biology, Assessment, and Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01358539

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 31S; abstract 203)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.31_suppl.203

Abstract #

203

Poster Bd #

A4

Abstract Disclosures