Phase III study of palonosetron (PALO) given as 30-min IV infusion (IV inf) versus 30-sec IV bolus (IV bol) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

Authors

null

Meinolf Karthaus

Klinikum Neuperlach, Munich, Germany

Meinolf Karthaus, Péter Szabò, Daniel Voisin, Giada Rizzi, Tudor Ciuleanu

Organizations

Klinikum Neuperlach, Munich, Germany, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching Hospital, Nyíregyháza, Hungary, Helsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland, Institute of Oncology/University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: PALO (0.50 mg), a distinctive second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (RA), is a component of the oral fixed combination agent NEPA, the second component being the NK1 RA netupitant. Oral NEPA is approved for acute and delayed CINV prophylaxis after moderately (MEC) and HEC. This study was conducted in support of the NEPA IV formulation (0.25 mg PALO + 235 mg fosnetupitant) administered as a 30-min IV inf, currently under FDA review. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients (pts) with solid tumors were randomized (1:1) to receive a single 0.25-mg PALO as a 30-min IV inf or a 30-sec IV bol, 30 min before reference HEC (cisplatin; dacarbazine), with oral dexamethasone (20 mg [D1]; 8 mg BID [D2–4]) (NCT02557035). Primary objective: noninferiority (NI; lower limit of the 99% CI to be >–15% [prespecified NI margin]) in complete response (CR; no emesis/no rescue) in the acute (0–24 h) phase. Secondary objective: safety. Results: 440 pts (median age 59.4 y [25–79]; cisplatin: 97.3%; dacarbazine: 2.7%) were randomized to IV inf (n=225) or IV bol (n=215). Baseline characteristics were similar. Acute CR rate was 82.7% (IV inf) and 86.5% (IV bol), with risk difference of –3.8% (99% CI: –12.2; 4.7) meeting the primary objective of NI. Treatment-emergent AE and study drug-related AE frequency was similar in both arms (Table). One PALO IV inf patient with pre-existing cardiac symptoms, experienced 1 serious AE that eventually lead to death and was considered possibly study drug-related by the investigator. No G≥3 infusion site reactions occurred. No patient in IV inf arm had infusion interruptions. Conclusions: PALO IV inf was noninferior to IV bol in acute CINV prevention after receiving non-AC HEC. Safety profiles were similar. No specific infusion toxicities were observed. The results show that PALO 0.25 mg IV inf is appropriate for the NEPA IV formulation. Clinical trial information: NCT02557035

Patients with treatment-emergent AEs by study arm: Safety population.

%PALO 30-min Infusion (N=225)PALO 30-sec Bolus (N=215)
SAEs6.75.6
Study drug-related AEs3.61.4
Study drug-related SAEs0.40

PALO, palonosetron; SAE, serious AE.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Symptom Biology, Assessment, and Management,Models of Care

Sub Track

Symptom Biology, Assessment, and Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02557035

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 31S; abstract 227)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.31_suppl.227

Abstract #

227

Poster Bd #

L5

Abstract Disclosures