Opioid switch and change of route of administration in palliative care cancer patients treated by morphine: Update of French guidelines.

Authors

null

Philippe Poulain

Clinique de l'Ormeau, Tarbes, France

Philippe Poulain, Nathalie Michenot, Sylvie Rostaing, Laurent Baron, Ivan Krakowski

Organizations

Clinique de l'Ormeau, Tarbes, France, Hopital A. Mignot, Le Chesnay, France, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, L’hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France, Cabinet Medical, Rabastens De Bigorre, France, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

Research Funding

Other

Background: In 2002 guidelines for the treatment of cancer pain (National Federation of French Cancer Centers) were adapted to the availability of drugs in France. In 2015, a group of experts nominated by the 3 French Societies involved in cancer pain (AFSOS, SFAP, SFETD: Supportive Care, Palliative Care and Pain Societies), reviewed these guidelines and established new ratios for morphine switching and/or changing the route of administration in patients whose pain was not adequately controlled. Methods: A review of the literature via Pubmed (key words: morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, tapentadol, pain, cancer, palliative care, opioid rotation, opioid switching, equianalgesic ratios) plus a manual search, led us to retain 43 original works containing good scientific evidence (methodology French Health Authority).Final approval for publishing was obtained from each of the aforementioned three scientific committees of the societies. Results: Experts explained why the theory of opioid rotation using fixed ratios was no longer appropriate for a secure practice. In the light of recent publications enhancing our knowledge on the efficacy of new drug switching ratios and for changing the route of administration of morphine, the group of experts recommended to use reconsidered switching ratios favoring security over efficacy, to minimize overdosing and adverse effects. Consequently, after the new conversion ratio (using slow release opioids) was applied, a second titration should be done by using normal release rescue formulations for breakthrough pain episodes. Conclusions: This work can be apply to an international situation (despite different drug availability amongst countries). A smartphone app is available for rapid and secure dose conversions and will be translated into English. The adequate opioid dose is obtained from a theoretical dose calculation adapted to patient’s personal situation and needs (second titration). Continuous updating of good practice guidelines may provide security and adequacy of prescription for adequate and safe pain relief for our patients, limiting overconsumption and risk of misuse.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Symptom Biology, Assessment, and Management,Models of Care

Sub Track

Symptom Biology, Assessment, and Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 31S; abstract 226)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.31_suppl.226

Abstract #

226

Poster Bd #

L4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Fumiko Chino

First Author: Philippe Poulain

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

The efficacy of ketamine for pain management in patients with cancer: A systematic review.

First Author: Leila Azari

First Author: Min Jung Geum