Outcomes of patients receiving chemotherapy at the end of life.

Authors

null

Laura Jennifer Van Metre

Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY

Laura Jennifer Van Metre, Bethann Scarborough, Cardinale B. Smith

Organizations

Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Research Funding

Other

Background: Chemotherapy within 14 days of death indicates poor quality end-of-life (EOL) care. Despite this, approximately 25% of patients receive EOL chemotherapy. This study identifies determinants of EOL chemotherapy. Methods: We identified patients who died in the hospital within 2 weeks of receipt of chemotherapy in 2012 and conducted a detailed chart review to identify demographic and clinical factors, clinical intent, and cause of death. Provider reasoning and assessments were collected. We identified and grouped cause of death into: treatment related, progression of disease, and sudden/unexpected. We used descriptive statistics to document factors associated with receipt of EOL chemotherapy. Results: Of 41 patients, 73% were male; mean age was 63 years; 71% had a hematological malignancy. Whereas solid tumor patients overwhelmingly died of progression of disease (83%), the majority of hematologic patients died of treatment related causes (62%) such as neutropenic sepsis and graft versus host disease. Furthermore, 41% of hematologic malignancy decedents were undergoing induction therapy. Similarly, though all solid tumor chemotherapy was palliative, 33% was for a new diagnosis. All solid tumor patients had a palliative care consultation, whereas 28% of hematologic malignancy patients did. Only 17% of induction chemotherapy patients received a palliative care consult. 76% of hematologic patients were DNR at time of death, while all solid tumor patients were DNR. Site of death varied with 52% of hematologic patients dying in ICU and 10% on the inpatient hospice unit. No solid tumor patients died in the ICU; 67% died on inpatient hospice. Only 10% of all patients had performance status documented. Clinical reasoning for chemotherapy included: disease modification, bridge to clinical trial or transplant, and palliation of symptoms. Conclusions: Patients with hematologic malignancies who received EOL chemotherapy had high ICU utilization and were less likely to have a palliative care consultation. Clinical intent, including early line therapy, may foster unrealistic clinician expectations. An improved understanding of avoidable causes of receipt of chemotherapy at EOL is important in addressing this gap in quality of care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management,Caregiver Support

Sub Track

End-of-Life Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 31S; abstract 70)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.31_suppl.70

Abstract #

70

Poster Bd #

H4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Impact of a mortality prediction tool on end-of-life (EOL) quality measures.

First Author: Jody S. Garey

First Author: Melissa R Rosen