Innovative pilot to reimburse nurse and social work-led advance care planning.

Authors

null

Angela Kalisiak

Compass Oncology, Portland, OR

Angela Kalisiak, Lisa Kathryn Hansen, Jamie Newell, Lydia Mills

Organizations

Compass Oncology, Portland, OR

Research Funding

Other

Background: Research has shown that advance care planning (ACP) leads to better patient care and outcomes. The Oregon Health Leadership Council (OHLC) identified ACP as an opportunity to improve care and offset costs. In 2014, the OHLC commissioned a workgroup to pilot a payment model to promote broader adoption of ACP. A community oncology provider and 4 health plans implemented the pilot for nurses (RNs) and licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs) to conduct ACP in an effort to elicit and honor patient preferences at end of life (EOL). Methods: Five RNs and 2 LCSWs underwent specific ACP training (by academic EOL educator or VitalTalk). They conducted one or more substantive ACP conversations (minimum 20 minutes) with 149 patients (89 female, 60 male; median age 64; range 24-92) between 12/5/14 and 5/9/16. Most patients had recurrent and/or metastatic cancer. Charts were reviewed in April 2017 for goals of care (GOC) discussion, ACP documents, preferences for EOL care, hospice enrollment, date of death, and death location. Results: Among all 149 patients, GOC discussion was documented for 126 (85%). Advance directives were in the chart for 34 (23%) and POLST for 53 (36%) patients. Among the 69 patients who died, 80% were on hospice (median days = 14; 15% on hospice < 3 days); 87% preferred comfort care at time of death. Three patients (4%) requested life-prolonging treatment until death. Conclusions: This pilot demonstrated that RNs and LCSWs can provide substantive ACP within robust team-based care. Hospice enrollment, POLST completion, and EOL care consistent with preferences were high. Cost data was inadequate to draw conclusions. While physician management, patient values, disease and treatment factors may also impact EOL choices, pilot data indicates that expanding ACP through trained RNs and LCSWs serves to normalize ACP as an integral component of quality care and promote outcomes congruent with GOC.

69 deceased patients#%
Deaths on hospice¥5580
GOC discussion6594
POLST4870
Advance directive1928
Surrogate identified4464
Care at death consistent with documented preferences¥¥66¥¥96
Death location:  
    Home5174
    Hospital1116
    SNF/ inpatient hospice34
    Unknown46

¥Data per obituary = 3; hospice unknown. ¥¥Care preferences unknown = 3.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Survivorship,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management,Caregiver Support

Sub Track

Advance Care Planning

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 31S; abstract 3)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.31_suppl.3

Abstract #

3

Poster Bd #

B4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Gunjan Sharma

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Implementation of advance care planning quality initiative in community cancer center.

First Author: Dana Weber

Abstract

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Societal benefits of surrogate outcomes to support reimbursement decisions: The case of prostate cancer.

First Author: Rafael de Feria Cardet