Clonal evolution in locally advanced rectal cancers in response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors

null

Sinead Toomey

Department of Molecular Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

Sinead Toomey , Aoife Carr , Jillian Rebecca Gunther , Joanna Fay , Anthony O'Grady , David Weksberg , Scott W Piraino , Elaine Kay , Brian O'Neill , Sunil Krishnan , Simon J Furney , Bryan Hennessy

Organizations

Department of Molecular Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Pathology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, Department of Histopathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, St. Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Centre for Systems Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dublin, Ireland

Research Funding

Other

Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer, LARC (T3/4 and/or N+) is currently treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), however clinicopathological response is variable. Monitoring clonal evolution in response to NACRT may identify mutations driving therapeutic resistance or tumor growth after treatment. Methods: Fresh-frozen pre- and post-NACRT tumor and matched normal tissue from LARC patients were stratified into good (RCPath A), intermediate (RCPath B) and poor (RCPath C) responders. Following histological review, targeted exome capture was performed using an Agilent SureSelect Human all Exome V3 kit. Samples were sequenced to a minimum of 100X coverage on an Illumina HiSeq2000, and clonal evolution was assessed in matched pre- and post-NACRT tumor samples. Results: The median somatic mutation burden in pre-treatment samples was 114 (IQR 19-207). Two tumors were microsatellite (MSI) unstable and had elevated mutational burdens. The least evolution occurred in the poor responders, where there was little change in clonal composition after treatment, and driver mutations in genes including TP53 and APC were retained. On average 79% of pre-treatment mutations were retained post-treatment in poor responders and 33% of mutations were retained in intermediate responders. Many of the intermediate responders had loss of driver mutations including TP53 from the pre-treatment sample, but also shared a number of mutations in genes including PIK3CA and BRAF between pre- and post-treatment samples. There was also increased frequency in the post-treatment samples of clones that were not present in the pre-treatment samples. In one intermediate responder, all 47 mutations that were present in the pre-treatment sample including the driver mutations TP53 and APC were absent in the post-treatment sample, while 10 completely new mutations were identified. Conclusions: Dynamic mutational processes occur in LARC following selective pressures of exposure to NACRT, including changes in somatic mutation presence or frequency after treatment, owing to persistence or loss of sub-clones. As NACRT can profoundly affect the LARC genome, monitoring molecular changes during treatment may be clinically useful.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Other Colorectal and Anal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 3616)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3616

Abstract #

3616

Poster Bd #

239

Abstract Disclosures