BRAF mutation and PD-L1 expression in melanoma: Comparison between multiple PD-L1 IHC clones and BRAF mutation evalutated by FDA-approved kits versus NGS.

Authors

null

Dennis O'Malley

NeoGenomics Laboratories, Aliso Viejo, CA

Dennis O'Malley , Sucha Sudarsanam , Vladislav Chizhevsky , Wanlong Ma , Shiping Jiang , Wayne Chen , Vincent Anthony Funari , Sally Agersborg , Maher Albitar

Organizations

NeoGenomics Laboratories, Aliso Viejo, CA

Research Funding

Other

Background: BRAF mutation and PD-L1 expression appear independent in melanoma. We have established that PD-L1 clones 22C3 and 28.8 show almost identical results. In this study we correlated between BRAF mutation and PD-L1 expression as detected by 22C3/28.8 and SP142 in melanoma clinical samples. Methods: Melanoma samples were tested for PD-L1 expression and BRAF mutation. IHC testing for PD-L1 22C3 or 28.8 were tested using FDA-approved kits as recommended. Testing with SP142 (Spring Biosciences; LDT) was performed using standard techniques. BRAF testing in combination with SP142 PD-L1 testing was performed using next generation sequencing covering exons 11 and 15. Samples tested with 22C3 and 28.8 clones were tested using FDA-cleared BRAF kits (Cobas, Therascreen) testing V600 only. Results: 68 samples were tested for PD-L1 expression with clone 22C3, 67 with 28.8, and 56 with SP142. There was no overall statistical difference between the three clones in PD-L1 expression (P = 0.41). For combined 22C3 and 28.8, 61 of 135 cases (45%) had PD-L1 expression and 31 (23%) had BRAF mutation detected using FDA kits (V600). There was no statistical correlation between PD-L1 expression and BRAF mutation in this group (P = 0.9) at any cut-off. In cases tested with SP142 clone, BRAF mutation was detected in 31 cases (55%) by NGS, higher than using the FDA kit (P < 0.0001). In V600 mutations by NGS, 14 cases (25%) were positive, similar FDA kits. In SP142 cases, PD-L1 was positive in 45% of cases. There was no correlation between BRAF mutation and PD-L1 using SP142 expression as a continuous variable (P = 0.59) or cut-off points of 5% or 50%. When cut-off of 20% was used, significant inverse correlation with BRAF mutation (P = 0.004) was identified and was maintained if V600 codon only was evaluated. Conclusions: There is no correlation between BRAF mutation and PD-L1 expression as detected using clones 22C3 and 28.8. With SP142, a negative correlation between PD-L1 expression and BRAF mutation is identified with a 20% cut-off. The rate of BRAF mutations practically doubles when NGS is used and exons 11 and 15 are included in the testing, in contrast to FDA approved testing.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr e21050)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.e21050

Abstract #

e21050

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Hidekazu Hirano

First Author: Stephanie Leigh Alden

First Author: Richard S.P. Huang

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

PD-L1 as a predictor of chemo-immunotherapy response in biliary tract cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

First Author: Juan Jose Juarez