Current trends and survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database from 2007 to 2013.

Authors

null

Brandon C. Chapman

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO

Brandon C. Chapman , Michael J. Weyant , Patrick W Hosokawa , Douglas M Overbey , Sarah Hilton , Martin McCarter , Ana Gleisner , Barish H. Edil , Csaba Gajdos

Organizations

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO, Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, Stamford Health, Stamford, CT

Research Funding

Other

Background: Although surgical resection is the treatment of choice for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), some evidence suggests that definitive chemoradiation (CR) may have equivalent survival compared to surgery alone. The objective of this study was to evaluate current trends in the treatment of ESCC and its impact on overall survival (OS). Methods: Using the NCDB (2004-2013), patients with non-metastatic/loco-regional ESCC were categorized into definitive CR, neoadjuvant CR/surgery, surgery alone, and surgery/adjuvant therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models by stepwise selection were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of predictors of OS. Results: We identified 11,229 patients with ESCC undergoing definitive CR (n = 8855, 78.9%), neoadjuvant therapy/surgery (n = 953, 8.5%), surgery alone (n = 1130, 10.1%), and surgery/adjuvant therapy (n = 291, 2.6%). The distance of primary tumor from incisors was comparable for all four groups. On multivariable analysis, treatment modality had the largest impact on OS followed by AJCC stage, age and annual surgical volume. Compared to neoadjuvant therapy/surgery, both surgery only (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32) and definitive CR (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.37-1.66) were associated with increased long-term mortality. However, there was no difference in mortality in the surgery/adjuvant therapy group (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.30) compared to the neoadjuvant therapy/surgery group. Patients treated at facilities performing more than 20 esophagectomies per year, regardless of whether they underwent surgical resection, had improved OS compared to facilities performing 10-19 per year (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.29-1.68), 5-9 per year (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29-1.62), and < 5 per year (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.38-1.70). Conclusions: Patients receiving either neoadjuvant therapy or adjuvant therapy and esophagectomy for ESCC have improved OS compared to patients undergoing esophagectomy alone and definitive CR. These findings suggest that patients with ESCC should be considered for multimodality treatment at high-volume centers and surgery should be included in the treatment plan whenever possible.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 4032)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.4032

Abstract #

4032

Poster Bd #

24

Abstract Disclosures