Standard of care vs reduced-dose chemoradiation after induction chemotherapy in HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors

null

Hope Rainey

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Hope Rainey , Elizabeth Roy , Isaiah Selkridge , Krzysztof Misiukiewicz , Vishal Gupta , Richard Lorne Bakst , David Y. Zhang , Tamar Kotz , Peter Som , Karen S. Anderson , Brett A. Miles , Eric Genden , Marita Teng , Marcelo Bonomi , Andrew Gregory Sikora , Elizabeth Demicco , Rachel Jia , Marshall R. Posner

Organizations

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, Arizona State University, Temple, AZ, Department of Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, Wake Forest Baptist School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Research Funding

Other

Background: Locally advanced Human Papillomavirus (HPV) + oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) has a significantly better response, locoregional control and survival compared to non HPVOPC. Standard-dose chemoradiotherapy (sdCRT) results in significant side effects, leading to acute and life-threatening late morbidity. We studied whether reduced dose chemoradiation (rdCRT) after induction chemotherapy (IC) resulted in equivalent progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sdCRT + IC with decreased late morbidity. Methods: Patients with locally advanced OPC and < 20 pack years (py) smoking history were tested for p16 and then HPV by type-specific PCR. After 3 cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) IC all HPV+/p16+ subjects underwent clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clinical responders were randomized to either sdCRT (70Gy) or rdCRT (56Gy) with weekly carboplatin (AUC 1.5) at a 1:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was 2 year PFS; the secondary endpoint was 2 year overall survival (OS). Toxicity, late morbidity and swallowing were monitored. Results: 23 patients were enrolled and 20 randomized, 8 to sdCRT and 12 to rdCRT; 2 were HPV- and 1 refused further therapy after IC and were not randomized. Median age was 56.5 yrs (range 36-78); 30% were African-American, 10% were Hispanic, 5% were female; 16 were HPV 16+ and 4 were other high risk (HR) variants; 60% never smoked, 25% were < 10 py, and 15% were 10-20 py; 70% had high risk features: T4, N2c, or N3. Clinical response to TPF was 100%; 70% had a clinical complete response. As of February 1, patients have been followed for a median of 37.5 months (range 21.7 – 49.5). 2 year PFS/OS for sdCRT and rdCRT are 87.5% vs 83.3% (log-rank test p = 0.85), respectively. All 3 failures were local or regional and 2 of 3 occurred in non HPV16 HR variants. Conclusions: HPV+ OPC patients who received rdCRT after TPF IC had similar PFS/OS compared to those receiving sdCRT. These results uphold the potential clinical benefit of radiation dose reduction as a treatment option with comparable survival to the standard radiation dose. A Phase III trial comparing IC plus rdCRT to sdCRT alone or with IC is warranted in this population. Non-HPV16 HR variants may have a worse outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT01706939

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01706939

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 6069)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.6069

Abstract #

6069

Poster Bd #

57

Abstract Disclosures