An intervention study to reduce black-white treatment disparities in early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors

Paul Walker

Paul R. Walker

East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC

Paul R. Walker , Sam Cykert , Lloyd Edwards , Rohan Arya , Peggye Dilworth-Anderson

Organizations

East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Racial disparities in the treatment of non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) continue to exist leading to poorer outcomes in African-Americans (AA) compared to Caucasians (C). Our previous multi-institutional prospective cohort study of 386 patients identified a surgical rate in early stage NSCLC of 66% C but only 55% AA (p = 0.05; OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.99). (Cykert et al JAMA 2010) A 3 year retrospective chart review of all patients with early stage NSCLC at the 3 academic institutions involved in this current intervention study identified 714 patients with early stage NSCLC. Baseline surgical rates 69% for C and 66% for AA. Combined stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with surgery C 80% and AA 76%. Controlling for co-morbidities, COPD, age and other demographic data, the OR for surgery AA compared to C 0.64 (95% CI 0.43-0.96) and for combined surgery or SBRT AA compared to C 0.61 (95% CI 0.43-0.96). Methods: Patients with a stage I or II NSCLC were identified and randomized to each institution’s standard of care approach or to an ‘intervention’ component utilizing a trained navigator to enhance patient communication and treatment understanding. Results: 244 patients were prospectively recruited into this intervention study. Mean age 65.7 years; 54% women; 89 (34%) AA. The intervention group showed an overall surgical rate of 74% (74.8% C, 71.4% AA; p = 0.6). Combined treatment of either surgery or SBRT increased an ablative treatment to 91.9% for C and 94.1% AA patients (p = 0.5). Logistic regression was performed comparing the intervention group to the baseline group. Results showed that overall treatment improved for both C and AA, the surgical and overall treatment disparity between C and AA was no longer present, while age, COPD, and clinical stage remained significant predictors of treatment. Conclusions: A multifaceted intervention designed to enhance patient communication and treatment understanding removed the surgical and overall early lung cancer treatment disparity between AA and C. Clinical trial information: NCT01687738

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01687738

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 6560)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.6560

Abstract #

6560

Poster Bd #

382

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Hirsh Koyi Sr.

First Author: Gustavo Schvartsman

First Author: Yusef Syed