Results of the OPARATIC trial: A phase I dose escalation study of olaparib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (GBM).

Authors

null

Sarah E. R. Halford

Cancer Research UK Centre for Drug Development, London, United Kingdom

Sarah E. R. Halford , Garth Cruickshank , Laurence Dunn , Sara Erridge , Lisa Godfrey , Christopher Herbert , Sarah Jefferies , Juanita Suzanne Lopez , Catherine McBain , Marc Pittman , Rebecca Sleigh , Colin Watts , Mark F Webster-Smith , Anthony J. Chalmers

Organizations

Cancer Research UK Centre for Drug Development, London, United Kingdom, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom, Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Glasgow, United Kingdom, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK, London, United Kingdom, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, LGC Group, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, The Beatson Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other

Background: Olaparib, a small molecule inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), may improve GBM outcomes by enhancing cytotoxic effects of ionising radiation and TMZ. Clinical development of PARP inhibitors has been restricted by exacerbation of hematological toxicity. We investigated tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) of olaparib and safety and tolerability of its combination with TMZ. Methods: Dose escalation explored different schedules of olaparib (tablet formulation) with 42 day cycles of daily low dose TMZ. A dose expansion cohort evaluated the maximum tolerated schedule. PK analysis was performed on tumor and blood samples from patients undergoing neurosurgical resection, who received 4 olaparib doses pre-operatively. Results: 48 patients were recruited (median age 51(18-68); 29 male, 19 female) of whom 27 underwent surgery and 35 received olaparib/TMZ and were evaluable. 13 evaluable patients received expansion dose schedule (median age 54(21-67); 9 male, 4 female). Olaparib was detected in 73 of 74 tumor core specimens from 27 patients; mean conc. 588nM (97-1374nM), and in 27 of 28 tumor margin specimens from 10 patients; mean conc. 500nM (97-1237nM). Margin: core ratios ranged from 0.2–3.9(mean 1.2); tumor: plasma ratios ranged from 0.01 to 0.9 (mean 0.25). Olaparib dosing on days 1-5 was hindered by myelosuppression. Expansion cohort dose was defined as TMZ 75 mg/m2daily plus olaparib 150 mg (OD) days 1-3 weekly. Of 13 evaluable patients receiving expansion dose-schedule, 9 completed cycle 1, 2 completed cycle 2 and 2 completed cycle 3. Currently 45% of the evaluable patients remain progression-free at 6 months, with 2 still on treatment (full data set May2017). Of 35 evaluable patients, 24 experienced AE Grade ≥3 (see Table). Conclusions: Olaparib penetrates both core and margins of recurrent GBM despite failing to penetrate the intact brain barrier in pre-clinical heathy rodent models. Combination with extended low dose TMZ is safe and well tolerated, yielding encouraging 6 month progression-free survival rates. Clinical trial information: NCT01390571

Most frequent AEsEvaluable patients experiencing AE
n%
Lymphopenia1851
Neutropenia926
Thrombocytopenia617
Anaemia514
Fatigue26

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Brain Metastases

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01390571

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 2022)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.2022

Abstract #

2022

Poster Bd #

264

Abstract Disclosures