A phase 3 trial of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer.

Authors

null

Willemien Van Driel

Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Willemien Van Driel , Karolina Sikorska , Jules Schagen van Leeuwen , Henk Schreuder , Ralph Hermans , Ignace de Hingh , Jacobus Van Der Velden , Henriëtte J.G. Arts , Massuger Leon , Arend Aalbers , Verwaal Victor J. , Koen van der Vijver , Neil K Aaronson , Gabe S. Sonke

Organizations

Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Sint-Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands, Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Cytoreductive surgery and systemic therapy are essential for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. We conducted a multicenter phase 3 trial to study whether the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy under hyperthermic conditions (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery would improve outcome among patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: We randomly assigned patients who showed at least stable disease after three cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) to receive interval cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC using cisplatin (100 mg/m2). Randomization was performed per-operatively and eligible patients had no residual mass greater than 2.5 mm. Three additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel were given post-operatively. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. Overall survival, toxicity, and quality-of-life were key secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 245 patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment strategies. In an intention-to-treat analysis, interval cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC was associated with longer recurrence-free survival than interval cytoreductive surgery alone (15 vs. 11 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.86; P=0.003). At the time of analysis, 49% of patients were alive, with a significant improvement in overall survival favoring HIPEC (48 vs. 34 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.91, P=0.01). The number of patients with grade 3-4 adverse events was similar in both treatment arms (28% vs. 24%, p=0.61). Quality-of-life analysis will follow. Conclusions: The addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery is well tolerated and improves recurrence free and overall survival in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00426257

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00426257

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 5519)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.5519

Abstract #

5519

Poster Bd #

341

Abstract Disclosures