SWOG S1310: Randomized phase II trial of single agent MEK inhibitor trametinib vs. 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine in refractory advanced biliary cancer.

Authors

null

Richard D. Kim

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

Richard D. Kim , Shannon L McDonough , Anthony B. El-Khoueiry , Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab , Stacey Stein , Vaibhav Sahai , George P. Keogh , Edward Jae-hoon Kim , Ari David Baron , Abby B. Siegel , Afsaneh Barzi , Katherine Guthrie , Milind M. Javle , Howard S. Hochster

Organizations

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, Department of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Charleston Hematology Oncology Associates PA, Charleston, SC, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, Columbia University, New York, NY, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT

Research Funding

NIH

Background: No standard treatment options are available for patients with advanced BC who fail gemcitabine/platinum therapy. The rationale for evaluation of trametinib was based on the presence of MAPK alterations and on earlier promising results with other MEK inhibitors in BC. Methods: Pts with histologically proven BC who progressed on gemcitabine/platinum were randomized to trametinib (2mg qd) (Arm A) vs infusional 5FU at 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2PO days 1-14 BID) (Arm B). Patients were stratified by planned chemotherapy 5FU/LV vs capecitabine; and disease site: cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). 80 eligible patients (40 for each arm) were needed to detect an improvement in median OS from 5 months to 8.25 months (1.65 HR). A planned interim futility analysis of objective response was performed on the first 14 pts registered to the trametinib arm. Results: The study was stopped early based on the lack of measurable response in the trametinib arm. 53 pts were randomized (27 pts in Arm A vs 26 pts in Arm B). Median age was 62 years and the primary sites of tumor were cholangiocarcinoma (77%) and gallbladder (23%). Median OS was 4.3 months (95% CI 3.1-5.1) for Arm A, and 8.0 months (95% CI 3.2-14.6) for Arm B with a HR of 2.02 (95% CI 1.01-4.03, p=0.05). The median PFS was 1.3 months (95% CI 1.2-1.5) for arm A and 2.8 months (95% CI 1.4-6.9) for arm B with a HR of 2.95 (95% CI 1.38-6.30, p=0.01). Overall RR was 8% (95% CI 0%, 19%) in Arm A vs 10% (95% CI 0%, 23%) in Arm B (p>0.99), and 8% vs 45% had stable disease. Eight pts in Arm A experienced treatment-related ≥ grade 3 toxicities, including one death due to vomiting/dehydration. Seven pts in Arm B experienced treatment-related grade 3 toxicities; no higher grade toxicities were reported. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomized study of a targeted agent versus chemotherapy for the second line treatment of BC. In this unselected population, the lack of response to trametinib resulted in early closure. The PFS and OS for trametinib were inferior to 5FU. Clinical trial information: 02042443.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

02042443

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 4016)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.4016

Abstract #

4016

Poster Bd #

8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts