Early detection of competing resistance mutations using plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients (pts) with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Authors

null

Nicolas Marie Guibert

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Nicolas Marie Guibert , Cloud Paweletz , Yuebi Hu , Nora B. Feeney , Vincent Plagnol , Valerie Poole , Greg Jones , Geoffrey R. Oxnard

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Inivata Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom, Inivata Ltd., Research Triangle Park, NC

Research Funding

Other

Background: In pts with EGFR+ NSCLC, genotyping of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become a routine option for non-invasive detection of EGFRT790M. We hypothesized that serial NGS of cfDNA would allow early detection of co-existent resistance mutations during osimertinib treatment. Methods: Serial plasma samples were collected from pts with advanced EGFR+ NSCLC and T790M+ acquired resistance treated with osimertinib. Up to 4 specimens were analyzed, blinded to tumor genotype: baseline, initial 2 follow-ups, and progression. Plasma NGS was performed using enhanced tagged amplicon sequencing of hotspots and coding regions from 36 genes. Diagnostic accuracy was compared to tumor genotype (including NGS when available) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) of cfDNA. Results: 94 specimens from 26 pts underwent plasma NGS. Studying 26 baseline specimens, plasma NGS was more sensitive than ddPCR for known EGFR driver mutations (100% vs 88.5%). In 8 pts with pretreatment tumor NGS, 5 of 6 TP53 mutations were detected; one plasma positive/tissue negative result was seen across 36 genes, a PIK3CA mutation (0.6% AF) which was confirmed using ddPCR (99.6% specificity). Quantitative concordance of AF compared to ddPCR was high (R = 0.94). 21 pts had detectable EGFR driver mutations at resistance. Among 6 pts with maintained T790M, 4 acquired C797S and 2 of these additionally acquired low level KRAS mutations (G13D, Q61K). Among 15 pts with loss of T790M, 7 had competing non-EGFR alterations identified: MET amp, PIK3CA E545K, BRAF V600E (n = 2), HER2 amp, KRAS G12S, and FGFR1 amp. Resistance mutations detected at AF > 0.3% were confirmed with ddPCR. In 3 pts, a competing resistance mutation (1 KRAS, 2 BRAF) could be detected in plasma NGS pretreatment and reemerged as putative drivers at time of resistance. Conclusions: In this retrospective blinded validation, tagged amplicon-based plasma NGS was more sensitive than ddPCR with high specificity and quantitative concordance. In a subset of cases, serial plasma NGS can detect emergence of competing resistance mutations, creating an opportunity for the study of osimertinib-based targeted therapy combinations.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Tumor Biology

Track

Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Circulating Biomarkers

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 11529)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.11529

Abstract #

11529

Poster Bd #

229

Abstract Disclosures