A randomized phase II trial comparing different schedules of nab-paclitaxel (nabP) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) as first line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

Authors

null

Philippa Corrie

Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Philippa Corrie , Wendi Qian , Bristi Basu , Juan W. Valle , Stephen Falk , Chinenyu Iwuji , Harpreet Singh Wasan , Daniel H. Palmer , Martin Scott-Brown , Jonathan Wadsley , Seema Safia Arif , John A. Bridgewater , David Propper , Roopinder Gillmore , Aarthi Gopinathan , Lisa Bax , Andrea Machin , Albrecht Neesse , David A. Tuveson , Duncan Ian Jodrell

Organizations

Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom, Oncology Department, Leicester, United Kingdom, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool and Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom, Institute of Cancer, Centre for Medical Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Universitatsmedizin Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: NabP+GEM chemotherapy improves survival compared with GEM monotherapy as treatment for mPDAC. A PDAC mouse model suggested that nabP potentiates GEM activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels and scheduling may be critical to optimise clinical benefit. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomised to receive standard concomitant (CON) nabP+GEM or sequential (SEQ) administration, with nabP given 24 hours before GEM. After 6 cycles, pts benefiting from treatment could continue the same regimen until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). Serial blood and baseline tumour samples were collected for exploratory biomarkers. Results: Between March 2014 and 2016, 146 pts (71 SEQ, 75 CON) were recruited. Median age (range) was 66 (45-82) years; Karnofsky performance status was 70 (in 12% pts), 80 (27%), 90 (38%) or 100 (24%); 47% had pancreatic head primaries; 84% had liver metastases. Median no. cycles received was 4 SEQ, 3 CON; 51 pts (35%) received ≥6 cycles of treatment (42% SEQ, 28% CON). A 24+2hr interval was achieved in > 90% SEQ admin. Grade ≥3 adverse events experienced by ≥10% pts (SEQ, CON) were neutropaenia (54%, 30%; p = 0.003), febrile neutropaenia (12%, 12%), fatigue (22%, 15%), vomiting (7%, 11%) and anaemia (10%, 5%). G-CSF was administered at local investigator's discretion to 35 pts (23 SEQ, 12 CON; p = 0.015). To date, 112 pts have died. 6 month (m) PFS by SEQ and CON arms were 47% and 33%; median PFS were 5.8 and 4.0m; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.46-0.95; 12m OS by SEQ and CON arms were 29% and 26%; median OS were 10.1 and 7.9m; HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.61-1.29. ORR was 50% SEQ and 33% CON (p = 0.065). Mean baseline QoL Global health status score was 60.6 SEQ and 63.4 CON. The mean change in QoL score from baseline at 24 weeks was -2.1 SEQ and -12.1 CON. Conclusions: Sequential delivery of nabP combined with GEM trended towards improving all clinically relevant efficacy end points: PFS, OS, and ORR. Translational correlates will be reported in due course. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN71070888.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ISRCTN71070888

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 4100)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.4100

Abstract #

4100

Poster Bd #

92

Abstract Disclosures