Primary results from a randomized (1:1), open-label phase II study of talimogene laherparepvec (T) and ipilimumab (I) vs I alone in unresected stage IIIB- IV melanoma.

Authors

null

Jason Alan Chesney

University of Louisville, Louisville, KY

Jason Alan Chesney , Igor Puzanov , Merrick I. Ross , Frances A. Collichio , Mohammed M. Milhem , Lisa Chen , Jenny J. Kim , Claus Garbe , Axel Hauschild , Robert Hans Ingemar Andtbacka

Organizations

University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel, Germany, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: T is a HSV-1-based oncolytic virus designed to selectively replicate in tumors and produce GM-CSF to stimulate antitumor immune responses. I is an anti-CTLA-4 Ab that blocks inhibition of activated T cells. This is the first randomized study to evaluate the addition of an oncolytic virus to a checkpoint inhibitor. Methods: The 1o endpoint was ORR by immune-related response criteria. Key 2o endpoints: duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS, and safety. Prior treatment was allowed but not required. Pts had unresected stage IIIB-IV melanoma with measurable/injectable tumor(s) and no evidence of immunosuppression. T was given at approved dosing until no injectable tumors, disease progression (PD), or intolerance. I was started at w6 in T+I and at w1 in I at 3 mg/kg IV q3w x 4. Primary analysis occurred 6 m after last pt enrolled. Results: 198 pts were randomized: 98 T+I; 100 I. Characteristics were similar: 54% stage IIIB-IVM1a, 46% IVM1b/c. Median follow up time was 68 w (T+I) and 58 w (I). ORR was 38.8% (T+I) and 18.0% I, P = 0.002, Odds ratio (OR) 2.9. 89% T+I and 83% I pts remain in response. Unconfirmed visceral lesion response was 35.5% T+I vs 13.6% I. OS is immature. Of 190 pts (safety set: 95 T+I, 95 I), most common adverse events (AEs) for T+I, I (%) were fatigue (59, 42), chills (53, 3), and diarrhea (42, 35). 28% T+I and 18% I pts had gr ≥3 tx-related AE. There were 3 deaths (all unrelated) in T+I: 1 myocardial infarction and 2 PD. Conclusions: The study met the 1o endpoint. ORR was significantly higher for T+I vs I; responses were not limited to injected lesions. Toxicity of T+I combination was tolerable with no unexpected AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01740297

T+I
N = 98
I
N = 100
ORRa– n (%)38 (38.8)18 (18.0)
(95% CI)(29.1, 49.2)(11.0, 26.9)
OR (95% CI)2.9 (1.5, 5.5), P = 0.002c
CR – n (%)13 (13.3)7 (7.0)
PR – n (%)25 (25.5)11 (11.0)
DCR – n (%)57 (58.2)42 (42.0)
(95% CI)(47.8, 68.1)(32.2, 52.3)
DRRb– n (%)29 (29.6)13 (13.0)
(95% CI)(20.8, 39.7)(7.1, 21.2)
PFS, events/N (%)52/98 (53.1)51/100 (51)
Median (95% CI) - m8.2 (4.2, 21.5)6.4 (3.2, 16.5)

aCR/PR required confirmation ≥ 4 w apart bDurable response rate = response ≥ 6 m; descriptive P= 0.007ccChi-square test with continuity correction

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01740297

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 9509)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.9509

Abstract #

9509

Poster Bd #

117

Abstract Disclosures