Activity of cabazitaxel in temozolomide refractory glioblastoma: Final results of a phase 2 study (C-GBM study; EudraCT 2013-001550-98 NCT 01866449).

Authors

null

Bernhard Heinrich

Hematological-Oncological Practice, Augsburg, Germany

Bernhard Heinrich , Richard F Schlenk , Olaf Lothar Brudler , Simone Edenhofer , Angelika Scheuerle , Ralph Naumann , Regine Mayer-Steinacker , Markus Bangerter , Lars Bullinger

Organizations

Hematological-Oncological Practice, Augsburg, Germany, Department of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany, Haematologisch-Onkologische Praxis, Augsburg, Germany, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Germany, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany, Oncological Practice, Augsburg, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Following progression on Temozolomide (TMZ) glioblastoma (GBM) is a therapeutic challenge with a 6 month survival rate of only ~20-30% and no well-established 2nd line treatments. Methods: We designed a phase II study to assess the efficacy of cabazitaxel, a second generation taxoid, in TMZ-refractory GBM pts (pts). Primary enpoint was response at 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), quality of life, and pharmacokinetics. The study population were pts with progressive GBM during or within 6 months after TMZ treatment, in whom radiotherapy and surgery was no treatment options. Exclusion criteria were signs of inflammation, an ECOG performance score (PS) > 2, as well as impaired organ function. Patient characteristics: In total, between 2014 and 2016 8 female and 16 male pts were included with a median age of 55 years (range 32-76 years) and a median of 3 previous therapies (range 1-9). Treatment: Cabazitaxel was given at 25mg/m² q3w with G-CSF prophylaxis. Every two cycles response assessment was performed (MRI). Treatment was discontinued in case of i) progressive disease (RANO criteria), ii) PS≥3, or iii) persistent toxicity. Results: Five pts went off study prior to the first MRI assessment due to progressive disease, while 19 of 24 of pts could be evaluated for response after 2 cycles. We did not observe any objective response (i.e. complete or partial remission). In 7 pts a stable disease (SD) was obtained; 12 pts had progressive disease. Of the 7 SD pts, 4 progressed after 4 cycles of treatment and the remaining pts remained in SD for 6, 10 and 12 cycles, respectively. The median OS was 155 days. Toxicity was manageable by G-CSF application in pts with CTC grade 3/4 neutropenia/leukopenia in 12 pts. Non-hematological toxicity CTC grade 3/4 comprised infection (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 2), vaginal bleeding (n = 1) and hypokalemia (n = 1). Conclusions: Cabazitaxel shows only marginal activity in TMZ refractory GBM with a disease stabilization rate following 4 cycles of only 12.5% in heavily pretreated GBM pts and median OS of 155 days. Clinical trial information: NCT 01866449.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT 01866449

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 2056)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.2056

Abstract #

2056

Poster Bd #

298

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts