Genetic polymorphisms of CCL5 and CCR5 to predict efficacy of cetuximab-based treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients depending on primary tumor location.

Authors

null

Mitsukuni Suenaga

Division of Medical Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

Mitsukuni Suenaga , Shu Cao , Sebastian Stintzing , Wu Zhang , Dongyun Yang , Yan Ning , Satoshi Okazaki , Martin D. Berger , Yuji Miyamoto , Marta Schirripa , Roel Gopez Jr., Elizabeth Melendez , Shivani Soni , Afsaneh Barzi , Toshiharu Yamaguchi , Volker Heinemann , Heinz-Josef Lenz

Organizations

Division of Medical Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Grosshadern, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Italy, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Research Funding

NIH

Background: EGFR signaling blockade increases CCL5 expression, which attracts with tumor-infiltrating leukocytes regulating either the host-derived anti-tumor immunity or tumor progression. We tested whether genetic polymorphisms in the CCL5/CCR5 axis could predict efficacy of cetuximab (CET)-based first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts). Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from 491 samples of two different cohorts with KRAS wild-type mCRC in the FIRE-3 study: an evaluation cohort of 244 pts receiving CET plus FOLFIRI (median age 64 yrs; median follow-up 34.1 mos); and a control cohort of 247 pts receiving bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI (median age 65 yrs; median follow-up 39.4 mos); Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CCL5 and CCR5 genes were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. Results: Pts in the evaluation cohort with any CCL5 rs2280789 G allele had shorter OS compared to those with the A/A variant (19.9 vs. 33.4 mos, HR 1.56, 95%CI: 1.05–2.30, P= 0.024), which was confirmed in multivariable analysis (HR 1.64, P= 0.015). Pts carrying any CCR5 rs1799988 T allele had a trend lower response rate than those with the C/C variant (68 vs. 81%, P= 0.078). Statistically significant differences in efficacy were shown between the groups consisting SNPs and tumor location (Table). The findings were not confirmed in the control cohort. Conclusions: Genetic variants of CCL5 and CCR5 SNPs may predict outcomes in mCRC pts receiving CET-based first-line treatment depending on tumor location.

Response rate (%)P valueMedian PFS (mos)HRP valueMedian OS (mos)HRP value
All KRAS wt
Location –CCR5< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
    La– C/C9110.6138.51
    L – Any T6610.01.3030.61.32
    Rb– T/T929.01.5627.11.66
    R – Any C486.53.0015.83.99
    –CCL50.280.001< 0.001
    L – A/A7410.5138.31
    L – Any G7110.01.1721.71.43
    R – A/A687.81.9521.92.45
    R – Any G443.92.1318.33.33
    All RAS wt
Location –CCR50.002< 0.001< 0.001
    L – C/C9211.5142.81
    L – Any T7510.51.1338.71.13
    R – T/T8812.21.4127.11.51
    R – Any C476.53.1211.74.73
    –CCL50.059< 0.001< 0.001
    L – A/A8210.9141.21
    L – Any G7310.01.1320.31.79
    R – A/A657.32.2316.53.04
    R – Any G403.92.1018.35.40

a left, b right

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 3594)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3594

Abstract #

3594

Poster Bd #

217

Abstract Disclosures