Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR
Todd S. Crocenzi , Anthony B. El-Khoueiry , Thomas Cheung Yau , Ignacio Melero , Bruno Sangro , Masatoshi Kudo , Chiun Hsu , Jorg Trojan , Tae-You Kim , Su-Pin Choo , Tim Meyer , Yoon-Koo Kang , Winnie Yeo , Akhil Chopra , Adyb Baakili , Christine Marie Dela Cruz , Lixin Lang , Jaclyn Neely , Theodore Welling
Background: Many pts with advanced HCC progress on SOC therapy. Nivo is a fully human anti–PD-1 IgG4 mAb that demonstrated durable responses (20% ORR with a median DOR of 9.9 mo; 9-mo OS rate was 74%) in pts with advanced HCC in the dose-expansion (EXP) phase of the CheckMate 040 study (NCT01658878; Melero et al. 2017). Here we present survival and durability of response data in both sor-naive and -experienced pts with advanced HCC in CheckMate 040. Methods: Pts naive to or previously treated with sor received nivo in phase 1/2 dose-escalation (ESC; 0.1–10 mg/kg) and -EXP (3 mg/kg) cohorts Q2W regardless of PD-L1 status. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability (ESC) and ORR (EXP; ORR by investigator [INV] and blinded independent central review [BICR]) using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included DOR, DCR, and OS. Biomarkers were assessed using pre-treatment tumor samples. Results: Overall, pts (N=262) had a median follow-up of 12.9 mo, and 98% had Child-Pugh scores 5–6. In sor-naive pts (n=80), the ORR (INV) was 23%, with 44% of responses (8/18) ongoing (Table). The DCR was 63%; 40% of pts had stable disease ≥6 mo. In sor-experienced pts (n=182; 91% progressed on sor), the ORRs (INV) were 16%–19%. Overall, responses occurred regardless of etiology or tumor cell PD-L1 expression. Nivo had a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other tumor types. Updated data with additional 4 mo of follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: Nivo demonstrated durable responses with long-term survival and favorable safety in both sor-naive and -experienced pts with advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01658878
Sor Naive | Sor Experienced | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESC + EXP (n=80) | ESC (n=37) | EXP (n=145) | ||||
INV | BICR | INV | BICR | INV | BICR | |
ORR, n (%)a | 18 (23) | 16 (20) | 6 (16) | 7 (19) | 28 (19) | 21 (14) |
CR | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 3 (8) | 1 (3) | 3 (2) | 2 (1) |
PR | 17 (21) | 15 (19) | 3 (8) | 6 (16) | 25 (17) | 19 (13) |
SD | 32 (40) | 25 (31) | 16 (43) | 12 (32) | 64 (44) | 60 (41) |
PD | 26 (33) | 32 (40) | 12 (32) | 13 (35) | 47 (32) | 56 (39) |
Not evaluable | 4 (5) | 5 (6) | 3 (8) | 4 (11) | 6 (4) | 8 (6) |
DOR, median (95% CI), moa | NR (6–NE) | 17 (NE–NE) | 17 (7–NE) | 19 (3–NE) | 12 (7–NE) | NR (11–NE) |
12-mo OS rate (95% CI), % | 73 (61–81) | 58 (40–72) | 60 (51–67) |
NR, not reached; NE, not estimable. aRECIST v1.1; mRECIST ORRs (BICR): sor naive, 24%; sor experienced, 22% (ESC), 19% (EXP).
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Aiwu Ruth He
2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ignacio Melero
2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ignacio Melero
2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Masatoshi Kudo