Double-blind, randomized phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of CT-P6, trastuzumab biosimilar candidate versus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment in HER2 positive early breast cancer (EBC).

Authors

null

Justin Stebbing

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

Justin Stebbing , Yauheni Valerievich Baranau , Valery Baryash , Alexey Manikhas , Vladimir Moiseyenko , Giorgi Dzagnidze , Edvard Javrid , Dmytro Boliukh , Daniil Stroyakovskiy , Joanna Pikiel , Alexandru E. Eniu , Dmitry Komov , Zakaria Zautashvili , Gabriela Morar-Bolba , Rubi Khaw Li , Igor Lifirenko , Andriy V. Rusyn , Sang Joon Lee , Sung Young Lee , Francisco J. Esteva

Organizations

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, Minsk City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Minsk, Belarus, City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, St Petersburg Clinical Center of Specialized Medical Care, St. Petersburg, Russia, National Cancer Centre, Tbilisi, Georgia, N.N. Alexandrov Republican Scientific and Practical Centre of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus, Vinnytsya Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Vinnytsya, Ukraine, Moscow City Oncology, Moscow, Russia, Wojewódzkie Centrum Onkologii, Gdansk, Poland, Cancer Institute Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Russian Oncology Research Centre Blokhin N.N., Moscow, Russia, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, Georgia, Cancer Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, St Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines, Kursk Regional Oncologic Dispensary, Kursk, Russia, Transkarpathian Regional University, Uzhgorod, Ukraine, CELLTRION, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea, New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: CT-P6 (C) is a proposed biosimilar to trastuzumab. This trial (NCT02162667) evaluated the similarity of C and trastuzumab in efficacy and safety for HER2+ EBC. Methods: 549 patients with HER2+ EBC were randomized to receive C (n=271) or trastuzumab (n=278) in combination with docetaxel (Cycles 1-4) and 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (Cycles 5-8). C or trastuzumab was administered at 8 mg/kg (Cycle 1 only) followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate at surgery. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PK, PD and safety. After surgery, patients received adjuvant C or trastuzumab to complete a total of 1-year treatment. Results: The pCR rate was 46.8% for C and 50.4% for trastuzumab. The 95% CIs for the risk ratio estimate were within the equivalence margin (0.74, 1.35) in PPS and ITT analyses. Other efficacy endpoints were similar between C and trastuzumab. The proportion of patients with at least 1 treatment-emergent SAE was 6.6% for C and 7.6% for trastuzumab. Only 1 patient in each group withdrew treatment due to significant LVEF decrease. Infusion-related reaction was reported for 8.5% of patients in C and 9.0% of patients in trastuzumab. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the similarity of efficacy in terms of pCR between CT-P6 and trastuzumab in EBC patients. Secondary efficacy endpoints also supported the similarity between CT-P6 and trastuzumab. CT-P6 was well tolerated with a similar safety profile to that of trastuzumab during the neoadjuvant period. Clinical trial information: NCT02162667

Summary of efficacy endpoints.

PPS
ITT
CT-P6
n=248
trastuzumab
n=256
CT-P6
n=271
trastuzumab
n=278
pCR rate (ypT0/is ypN0)
    pCR rate46.850.443.547.1
    (95% CI)(40.4 – 53.2)(44.1 – 56.7)(37.6 – 49.7)(41.1 – 53.2)
Risk ratio estimate (95% CI)0.9282
(0.7753 – 1.1113)
0.9240
(0.7687 – 1.1108)
pCR rate (ypT0 ypN0)
    pCR rate39.941.437.338.8
    (95% CI)(33.8 – 46.3)(35.3 – 47.7)(31.5 – 43.3)(33.1 – 44.9)
Risk ratio estimate (95% CI)0.9641
(0.7806 – 1.1906)
0.9593
(0.7749 – 1.1877)
ORR (independent review)
    ORR87.186.384.984.2
    (95% CI)(82.3 – 91.0)(81.5 – 90.3)(80.0 – 88.9)(79.3 – 88.3)
Risk ratio estimate (95% CI)1.0089
(0.9423 – 1.0803)
1.0083
(0.9386 – 1.0831)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02162667

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 510)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.510

Abstract #

510

Poster Bd #

110

Abstract Disclosures