Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Justin Stebbing , Yauheni Valerievich Baranau , Valery Baryash , Alexey Manikhas , Vladimir Moiseyenko , Giorgi Dzagnidze , Edvard Javrid , Dmytro Boliukh , Daniil Stroyakovskiy , Joanna Pikiel , Alexandru E. Eniu , Dmitry Komov , Zakaria Zautashvili , Gabriela Morar-Bolba , Rubi Khaw Li , Igor Lifirenko , Andriy V. Rusyn , Sang Joon Lee , Sung Young Lee , Francisco J. Esteva
Background: CT-P6 (C) is a proposed biosimilar to trastuzumab. This trial (NCT02162667) evaluated the similarity of C and trastuzumab in efficacy and safety for HER2+ EBC. Methods: 549 patients with HER2+ EBC were randomized to receive C (n=271) or trastuzumab (n=278) in combination with docetaxel (Cycles 1-4) and 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (Cycles 5-8). C or trastuzumab was administered at 8 mg/kg (Cycle 1 only) followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate at surgery. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PK, PD and safety. After surgery, patients received adjuvant C or trastuzumab to complete a total of 1-year treatment. Results: The pCR rate was 46.8% for C and 50.4% for trastuzumab. The 95% CIs for the risk ratio estimate were within the equivalence margin (0.74, 1.35) in PPS and ITT analyses. Other efficacy endpoints were similar between C and trastuzumab. The proportion of patients with at least 1 treatment-emergent SAE was 6.6% for C and 7.6% for trastuzumab. Only 1 patient in each group withdrew treatment due to significant LVEF decrease. Infusion-related reaction was reported for 8.5% of patients in C and 9.0% of patients in trastuzumab. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the similarity of efficacy in terms of pCR between CT-P6 and trastuzumab in EBC patients. Secondary efficacy endpoints also supported the similarity between CT-P6 and trastuzumab. CT-P6 was well tolerated with a similar safety profile to that of trastuzumab during the neoadjuvant period. Clinical trial information: NCT02162667
PPS | ITT | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
CT-P6 n=248 | trastuzumab n=256 | CT-P6 n=271 | trastuzumab n=278 | |
pCR rate (ypT0/is ypN0) | ||||
pCR rate | 46.8 | 50.4 | 43.5 | 47.1 |
(95% CI) | (40.4 – 53.2) | (44.1 – 56.7) | (37.6 – 49.7) | (41.1 – 53.2) |
Risk ratio estimate (95% CI) | 0.9282 (0.7753 – 1.1113) | 0.9240 (0.7687 – 1.1108) | ||
pCR rate (ypT0 ypN0) | ||||
pCR rate | 39.9 | 41.4 | 37.3 | 38.8 |
(95% CI) | (33.8 – 46.3) | (35.3 – 47.7) | (31.5 – 43.3) | (33.1 – 44.9) |
Risk ratio estimate (95% CI) | 0.9641 (0.7806 – 1.1906) | 0.9593 (0.7749 – 1.1877) | ||
ORR (independent review) | ||||
ORR | 87.1 | 86.3 | 84.9 | 84.2 |
(95% CI) | (82.3 – 91.0) | (81.5 – 90.3) | (80.0 – 88.9) | (79.3 – 88.3) |
Risk ratio estimate (95% CI) | 1.0089 (0.9423 – 1.0803) | 1.0083 (0.9386 – 1.0831) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Petr Krivorotko
2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Xavier B. Pivot
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Ana Carolina Ferreira Cardoso
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Min-Ho Park