University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cancer Center Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA
Robert L. Ferris , Lisa Licitra , Jérôme Fayette , Caroline Even , George R. Blumenschein Jr., Kevin Harrington , Joel Guigay , Everett E. Vokes , Nabil F. Saba , Robert I. Haddad , Shanmugasundaram Ramkumar , Jeffrey Russell , Peter Brossart , Makoto Tahara , Manish Monga , Jin Zhu , A. Dimitrios Colevas , Maura L. Gillison
Background: In CheckMate 141, nivo resulted in significantly prolonged overall survival (OS), favorable safety, and stable quality of life vs IC in patients (pts) with platinum-refractory (PR) R/M SCCHN. Cetuximab, a formal trial stratification factor, permits exploratory subgroup assessment. Outcomes by prior cetuximab use are described. Methods: CheckMate 141 was a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT02105636) in which pts (N = 361) with PR R/M SCCHN were randomized 2:1 and stratified by prior cetuximab use to nivo 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or IC of methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab. The primary endpoint was OS; additional endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. A multivariate analysis will explore influence of additional factors. Results: Nivo improved OS vs IC regardless of prior cetuximab, and improvement was greater in pts without prior cetuximab (Table). Median OS was longer for nivo vs IC in pts with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% regardless of prior cetuximab, and in pts with PD-L1 expression < 1% without prior cetuximab. Among pts with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%, ORR was higher with nivo vs IC with/without prior cetuximab. PFS was similar regardless of prior cetuximab. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event rates for nivo vs IC were 11.7% vs 40.9% with prior cetuximab and 15.4% vs 26.7% without prior cetuximab. Conclusions: OS and ORR improved with nivo vs IC regardless of prior cetuximab use, and the magnitude of benefit was greater in pts without prior cetuximab exposure. These results support the use of nivo for R/M SCCHN regardless of prior cetuximab use. Clinical trial information: NCT02105636
Without Prior Cetuximab | With Prior Cetuximab | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Nivo (n = 93) | IC (n = 47) | Nivo (n = 147) | IC (n = 74) | |
Median OS (95% CI), mo | 8.1 (5.3, 12.7) | 4.7 (3.0, 7.2) | 6.9 (4.9, 8.8) | 5.2 (4.1, 6.8) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.55 (0.35, 0.86) | 0.81 (0.57, 1.15) | ||
ORR, % (n/N) | 17.2 (16/93) | 4.3 (2/47) | 10.9 (16/147) | 6.8 (5/74) |
ORR among HPV+ pts, % (n/N) | 29.6 (8/27) | 0 (0/11) | 5.6 (2/36) | 5.6 (1/18) |
ORR among pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, % (n/N) | 19.4 (7/36) | 0 (0/21) | 15.4 (8/52) | 2.5 (1/40) |
HPV = human papillomavirus; HR = hazard ratio; PD-L1 = programmed death ligand 1
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nicole Conci
2018 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nabil F. Saba
2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Maura L. Gillison
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ilya Tsimafeyeu