Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
Antoine Hollebecque , Tim Meyer , Kathleen N. Moore , Jean-Pascal H. Machiels , Jacques De Greve , José María López-Picazo , Ana Oaknin , Joseph N. Kerger , Valentina Boni , T.R. Jeffry Evans , Rebecca Sophie Kristeleit , Shangbang Rao , Ibrahima Soumaoro , Z. Alexander Cao , Suzanne Louise Topalian
Background: Treatment options for cervical, vaginal, and vulvar (GYN) cancers are limited after first-line therapy. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is associated with squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix (≥90%) and vulva/vagina (40–70%), and may elicit an immune reaction. Programmed death (PD)-1 and its major ligand PD-L1 are expressed in GYN cancers and inhibit immune responses. Nivolumab disrupts PD-1–mediated signaling, restoring antitumor immunity. Methods: In CheckMate 358 (NCT02488759), an ongoing multicohort study of 5 virus-associated cancers, PD-L1–unselected adults with R/M GYN cancers, ECOG PS 0–1, and ≤2 prior systemic therapies for R/M disease were eligible to receive nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety; secondary endpoints were duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 24 treated patients (pts), 19 had cervical and 5 had vaginal or vulvar cancer; median age was 51 y. At a median follow-up of 31 wks (range: 6–38), ORR was 20.8% (Table), and disease control rate (ORR + SD) was 70.8%. All responses were in pts with cervical cancer (ORR, 26.3%) and were observed regardless of PD-L1 or HPV status or number of prior R/M therapies. Median PFS was 5.5 mo (95% CI: 3.5, NR); median OS was NR. Conclusions: Nivolumab demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in pts with cervical cancer and a manageable safety profile in virus-associated GYN cancers, supporting further evaluation in these pts. Updated clinical and biomarker data to be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02488759
Response-evaluable pts (N = 24) | Prior systemic R/M therapies | ||
---|---|---|---|
0 (n = 7) | ≥1 (n = 17) | ||
Best overall response, n (%) | |||
Complete response | 1 (4.2) | 0 | 1 (5.9) |
Partial response | 4 (16.7) | 2 (28.6) | 2 (11.8) |
Stable disease (SD) | 12 (50.0) | 3 (42.9) | 9 (52.9) |
Progressive disease | 7 (29.2) | 2 (28.6) | 5 (29.4) |
ORR, % (95% CI) | 20.8 (7, 42) | 28.6 (4, 71) | 17.6 (4, 43) |
Time to response, median (range), mo | 5.3 (1.9, 7.1) | ||
DoR, median, mo | NR | ||
Treatment-related adverse events, % | |||
Any grade | 70.8 | ||
Grade 3–4 | 12.5 |
NR = not reached.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Shailender Bhatia
2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jean-Pierre Delord
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Kazuto Nakamura
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Joseph J. Sacco