Cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer survivors: A longitudinal analysis compared to matched controls.

Authors

null

AnnaLynn Williams

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

AnnaLynn Williams , Charles E. Heckler , Carly Lynn Paterson , Debra L. Barton , Kelley Lynn Young , Alison Katherine Conlin , Lora Rose Weiselberg , Karen Michelle Mustian , Luke Joseph Peppone , Michelle Christine Janelsins

Organizations

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Kansas City NCORP, Kansas City, KS, Hematology and Oncology Clinic, Portland, OR, Monter Cancer Center, Lake Success, NY

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is commonly reported among breast cancer survivors and can negatively impact quality of life and treatment adherence. Large, prospective, longitudinal studies assessing CRF in breast cancer survivors compared to matched non-cancer controls are rare. Methods: Breast cancer survivors (n = 581, stage I-IIIBC, mean age 53.4) from community oncology clinics and age-matched controls (n = 364, mean age 52.6) completed the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI, scores range -24 to 96) prior to chemotherapy (T1), at chemotherapy completion (T2) and six-months after chemotherapy (T3). Linear mixed models compared trajectories of CRF over time in survivors compared to controls, adjusting for age, education, race, BMI, marital status, menopausal status, and depressive symptoms. Results: Survivors reported greater CRF compared to controls at all time points (mean total score T1 9.4 vs. -3.7, T2 17.0 vs. -3.3, and T3 8.5 vs. -3.1, all p < 0.001; all subscales p < 0.001). From T1 to T2 survivors experienced a significant increase in CRF as shown in the total score (mean change (MC) = 8.3; effect size (ES) = 0.4 , p < 0.001), and general, mental, and physical sub-scales (MC = 4.3, 2.1, 3.2 , ES = 0.7, 0.5, 0.7, respectively, all p < 0.001), while controls experience minimal changes (MC = 0.1-0.3, ES < 0.09, p > 0.05). At T3 survivors total score returned to T1 values (MC = -0.1, ES = 0.01, p = 0.461), which was, however, still greater than controls ( p < 0.001), while general, mental, and physical CRF subscale scores remained significantly higher than T1 values (MC = 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, ES = 0.2, 0.4, 0.3, respectively, all p < 0.001; controls no change). Group by time interactions indicated changes over time were greater in the survivors than controls (p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses of survivors, age, BMI, performance status, and baseline depression significantly predicted change in CRF. Conclusions: These results from the largest well-controlled study to date showed that breast cancer survivors experience significantly more CRF prior to and after chemotherapy compared to healthy controls. Further research should aim to identify subgroups of survivors most susceptible to CRF.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Psychosocial and Communication Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 10045)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.10045

Abstract #

10045

Poster Bd #

34

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jingran Ji

Abstract

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in breast cancer survivors after treatment: A focus on physical condition.

First Author: Ana Ruiz-Casado

First Author: Erin Aiello Bowles