Targeted therapy for HER2 driven colorectal cancer.

Authors

Jeffrey Ross

Jeffrey S. Ross

Albany Medical College, Albany, NY

Jeffrey S. Ross , Siraj Mahamed Ali , Julia Andrea Elvin , Alexa Betzig Schrock , James Suh , Jo-Anne Vergilio , Shakti Ramkissoon , Eric Allan Severson , Sugganth Daniel , David Fabrizio , Garrett Michael Frampton , Vincent A. Miller , Philip J. Stephens , Laurie M. Gay

Organizations

Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, George Washington University, Washington, DC, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: ERBB2 (HER2) genomic alterations (GA) are evolving therapy taregets in metastatc coorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Hybrid capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed on 8874 (9.6%) mCRC including both colonic adenocarcinomas (7587 cases; 85%) and rectal adenocarcinomas (1287 cases, 15%) Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated from a minimum of 1.2 Mb of sequenced DNA. Results:ERBB2 amplifications or a short variant (SV) alterations or both were found in 433 (4.9%) of the total mCRC. 195 (45%) of the ERBB2 positive mCRC were female and 238 (55%) were male. Median age was 54 years (range 22 to 88 years). The most frequently co-altered genes were SV GA in TP53 (82%), APC (70%), KRAS (26%), SMAD4 (15%) and PIK3CA (13%). Clinically relevant GA significantly under-represented in ERBB2-altered CRC included significantly reduced GA in KRAS at 26% (p = 0.001) and BRAF at 4% (p = 0.003) as well as other kinases at 1% including EGFR, KIT, MET and RET. The frequency of TMB at > 10 mut/Mb (p < 0.0001), but at > 20 mut/Mb mCRC cases demonstrated virtually the same results regardless to ERBB2 status at a frequency of x%. The overall ERBB2 GA frequency at 5.3% in rectal mCRC is slightly higher than that seen in colonic mCRC at 4.9%, (p = 0.36). The frequency of TMB > 10 mut/Mb in ERBB2 WT mCRC is greater in the colonic mCRC than the rectal mCRC (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). When > 20 mut/Mb is used as the cut-off, the greater frequency of TMB in colonic mCRC versus rectal mCRC remains significant (p < 0.0001). When the ERBB2altered mCRC cases are evaluated, the greater frequency of TMB > 10 mu/Mb in colonic mCRC versus rectal mCRC remains significant (p = 0.009), but the greater frequency in colonic verses rectal mCRC at the > 20 mut/Mb is not significant (p = 0.37). Conclusions: Although lower than observed in breast and upper gastrointestinal carcinomas where anti-HER2 therapies are approved indications, the frequency of ERBB2 GA in CRC at 4.9% is significant. Importantly, nearly half of CRC ERBB2 alterations are SVs, not detectable by routine IHC and FISH testing. However, the success of anti-HER2 therapies shown here and progress in on-going clinical trials indicates that targeting ERBB2 has potential to become an approved advance in precision therapy for mCRC patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 3583)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3583

Abstract #

3583

Poster Bd #

206

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts