A phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in the presence of dual HER2-blockade for HER2+ breast cancer: The TRAIN-2 study (BOOG 2012-03).

Authors

null

Mette S. Van Ramshorst

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Mette S. Van Ramshorst , Erik van Werkhoven , Ingrid A. Mandjes , Inge Kemper , Vincent O. Dezentjé , Irma M. Oving , Aafke H. Honkoop , Lidwine W Tick , Agnes W Van de Wouw , Caroline M Mandigers , Jelle Wesseling , Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters , Sabine C. Linn , Gabe S. Sonke

Organizations

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, Netherlands, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente (ZGT), Almelo, Netherlands, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands, Viecuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade boosts pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2+ breast cancer. The optimal chemotherapy backbone in this setting is unknown. We conducted a multicenter phase III trial to study whether anthracyclines would improve outcome compared to a carboplatin-taxane regimen (NCT01996267). Methods: We randomly assigned (1:1) patients with stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer to receive 9 cycles paclitaxel (80mg/m2 day 1 and 8) and carboplatin (AUC = 6mg/ml·min) (arm A) or 3 cycles 5-fluoruoracil (500mg/m2), epirubicin (90mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500mg/m2) followed by 6 cycles paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm B). Both arms received trastuzumab (6mg/kg, loading dose 8mg/kg) and pertuzumab (420mg, loading dose 840mg) concurrent with all chemotherapy cycles, and cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was pCR in breast and axilla (ypT0/is,ypN0). Results: 438 patients were included and 418 (arm A 206 vs arm B 212) were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The pCR rate did not differ between arms (arm A 68% [95% CI 61-74] vs arm B 67% [95% CI 60-73], p = 0.75). Hormone receptor (HR) negative tumors had significantly higher pCR rates (87% vs 54%, p < 0.0001), but we found no evidence for treatment-by-HR interaction (p = 0.23). Common adverse events grade ≥3 were neutropenia (arm A 53% vs arm B 57%, p = 0.34), febrile neutropenia (arm A 2% vs arm B 11%, p = 0.0001), and diarrhea (arm A 17% vs arm B 12%, p = 0.14). Neuropathy grade ≥2 was common in both arms (arm A 31% vs arm B 29%, p = 0.83), while left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline grade ≥2 (defined as ≥10% decline from baseline or LVEF < 50%) was more common in arm B (arm A 18% vs arm B 29%, p = 0.007). Symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was rare ( < 1%) in both arms. Conclusions: Anthracyclines increase the incidence of febrile neutropenia and grade ≥2 LVEF decline, but do not improve pCR rate in the contemporary neoadjuvant treatment of HER2+ breast cancer with dual HER2 blockade. Therefore, we currently favor a carboplatin-taxane based regimen. Follow-up is required to confirm these results with regard to long-term outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT01996267

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01996267

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 507)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.507

Abstract #

507

Abstract Disclosures