Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: Surgical results from an international randomized trial (BrighTNess).

Authors

Mehra Golshan

Mehra Golshan

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Mehra Golshan , Sibylle Loibl , Jens Bodo Huober , Joyce O'Shaughnessy , Hope S. Rugo , Norman Wolmark , Mark D. McKee , David Maag , Danielle Marie Sullivan , Vincent L. Giranda , Xuan Liu , Gunter Von Minckwitz , Charles E. Geyer Jr., William M. Sikov , Michael Untch

Organizations

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, AbbVie Inc., Chicago, IL, German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany, Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) increases the frequency of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in stage II-III breast cancer, but there is little data on how often it converts patients (pts) from BCT-ineligible (BCT-I) to BCT-eligible (BCT-E) and on the impact of other factors on surgical choices. We collected surgical assessment and management data from an international randomized trial of NST in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: Women with operable TNBC were randomized to veliparib (V) with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P), placebo with C and P or placebo with P followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. The surgeons assessed BCT candidacy by clinico-radiographic criteria before and after NST; surgical management was at surgeon and patient discretion. We assessed interactions between BCT eligibility pre- and post-NST, germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA) status, continent of treatment and achievement of pathologic complete response(pCR) and percentage of pts who underwent BCT versus mastectomy. Results: Pre- and post-NST surgical assessments were available for 604 pts who underwent surgery. BCT rates are listed in the Table. The BCT rate was 68% among pts deemed BCT-E after NST. pCR rates were identical between BCT-E pts who chose BCT (55%) vs. mastectomy (53%). Of 141 pts deemed BCT-I at baseline, 75 (53%) converted to BCT-E but only 42 (56%) of these opted for BCT. pCR rates were 49% in BCT-E converts vs. 36% in those remained BCT-I. gBRCA pts (n = 84) were less likely to choose BCT even if they were BCT-E. Pts treated in North America (NA) were less likely to choose BCT (55% vs. 80% for Europe and Asia P<0.0001) even among non-gBRCA considered BCT-E post-NST (61% vs. 85% P<0.0001). Conclusions: This largest prospective analysis of the impact of NST in TNBC demonstrates a conversion rate from BCT-I to BCT-E of 53%. BCT rates were lower in pts with gBRCA; the much higher mastectomy rate among BCT-E pts in NA merits investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02032277

CategoryAll pts
Post-NST BCT-E
NBCTNBCT
All60457%50768%
Non-gBRCA52062%43974%
    gBRCA8426%6832%
North America28147%23855%
NA non-gBRCA24652%20961%
Europe/Asia32367%26980%
E/A non-gBRCA27472%23085%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02032277

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 514)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.514

Abstract #

514

Poster Bd #

114

Abstract Disclosures