Radiation therapist (RT) perceptions and practices related to safety culture (SC) and error reporting in radiation oncology.

Authors

null

David Hashemi

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

David Hashemi, Kristina Demas Woodhouse, Brian Monzon, Seth A. Rosenthal, Neha Vapiwala

Organizations

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, Sutter Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA

Research Funding

Other

Background: The delivery of radiotherapy is complex and demands careful management, high vigilance, and precise coordination of clinical personnel. RTs are at the frontline and are often first to discover or report an error. However, few studies have examined RT patient safety practices. We conducted a national survey to explore the attitudes, training, and experiences of RTs related to safety in radiation oncology. Methods: In 2016, an electronic survey was sent in June and July to a random sample of 1,500 RTs (~10% of licensed RTs in the US). The survey assessed department SC, error reporting, knowledge, and practices. Questions were multiple choice or recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 702 RTs from 48 states (47% response rate) completed the survey. Respondents represented a broad distribution across practice and geographic settings with varying levels of work experience (see table). Most RTs gave their department a “Patient Safety Grade” of Excellent (61%) or Very Good (32%), especially if they had an Incident Learning System (ILS) (OR: 2.0). Most departments (58%) had an ILS; however 59% of RTs had not reported an event in the previous year. When an error occurred but did not result in patient harm, 39% of RTs said they would report it and 37% said they would not. Bullying was reported among 17% of respondents; 40% reported that burnout, stress, and anxiety negatively impacted their ability to effectively treat patients. RTs reported errors were more likely to occur with longer work days (>8hrs) and poor multidisciplinary communication during handoffs and transitions. Most (62%) reported they could benefit from additional patient safety education and training, indicating significant interest in this topic. Conclusions: The majority of RTs reported excellent SC practices within their treatment facilities. Most facilities had systems in place to report errors. The obstacles identified, the results of this study may inform future educational efforts and safety initiatives directed towards RTs and should help increase awareness of patient SC in radiation oncology.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2017 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Patient Safety and Science of Quality

Track

Patient Safety,Science of Quality

Sub Track

Focus on Organization and Culture

Citation

J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 8S; abstract 42)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2017.35.8_suppl.42

Abstract #

42

Poster Bd #

A10

Abstract Disclosures